Sigma DP2 vs. DSLR: Image Quality Comparison
One of the things you’ll hear Sigma tout in promoting the Sigma DP2 is its “DSLR-like” image quality, and indeed this is what has largely driven my interest in the DP2. It’s a relatively simple thing to say the the DP2 easily outdoes anything else in the compact world, but does it actually rival DSLR image quality? Well to answer that question I took the DP2 and the Olympus E-620, setup a tripod, and photographed the same scene with both cameras, both in aperture priority at f/8 and ISO 100. The lens on the DP2 is the 35mm equivalent of 41mm, so I set the Olympus E-620 to 20mm which provides a 35mm equivalent of 40mm.
The result is fairly clear. The Sigma DP2 provides very similar image quality to the Olympus E-620, rivaling it nearly every respect. If your judging on clarity, sharpness, dynamic range, and overall feel, you’d have to say the DP2 delivers on the DSLR-like I.Q. Now, for sure the DP2 doesn’t offer the power or versatility of any DSLR, let alone the very good Olympus E-620, but just to drive this point home—you aren’t going to get this from any other compact size camera.
Well, with one exception. Clearly the E-P1 throws a bit of a wrench in making the case for the DP2. The DP2 is about $150 cheaper than an E-P1 fitted with the 14-42mm, and just a bit smaller and lighter (again with lens attached). But obviously the E-P1 is really providing nearly all the power, versatility, and image quality of a DSLR camera in a compact size. For the mischieveious I’m tempted to point out that the E-P1 uses the same sensor as the E-620, and the same type lens, though of course I have to clarify the E-P1 has an improved image processor in TruePic V, which is claimed to provide better noise reduction and improved moirĂ© removal.
At $650, the DP2 isn’t cheap, but it’s safe to say that it does take pictures just as good (or very nearly so) as an even more expensive DSLR camera. I’ve only had it for a week thus far, and clearly already fond of it. It helped a great deal to know in advance what to expect on the negative side, and I continue to maintain that if you’re willing to except those limitations (or “make those excuses”) you’ll be very pleased with the DP2’s results. It’s easy to see the DP2 getting a place in many a photographers camera bag, but it does have its time and place. With the DP2, using it is kind of along the lines of “I wonder how this will turn out”, in other words I’m curious how the DP2 will interpret the subject, rather than just documenting or capturing the subject. It’s a different experience, but I’m really liking it so far. (I’ll just add that I also really enjoyed the E-620, a surprisingly powerful little DSLR…but more on that in our review this week.)
On the images, as always, click to enlarge, but better to check out the full size, untouched in anyway originals, via the “original size” link.
![]()
get the Sigma DP2 at Amazon, B&H Photo
![]()
Olympus E-620 at Amazon, B&H Photo
Similar Posts:
- A First Look at the Sigma DP1s
- Olympus E-620 Review at Neocamera
- Sigma Announces DP1s
- Sigma DP1s Available in October
- Sigma DP2 Review: Inspiring Image Quality





















Canon EOS 5D Mark II DSLR Camera Body with Free 16GB CF Card: $2499 and ships free from B&H Photo
Canon PowerShot SD780 IS Digital Camera: $229 and ships free from B&H Photo
LaCie 1TB d2 Quadra Hard Drive: $149 and ships free from B&H Photo








The E-P1 *does not* use the same sensor of the 620.
Just FYI.
Well, considering the current bargains for the DP2 at EUR 289 (cash back), it’s *a lot* cheaper than an EP-1.
If you put this in the equation…
@burkm Where have you found such a bargain? DP2’s price seems to have stuck around 500E afaik.
I don’t see how this is a good comparison as the DP2 image is almost half the size of the olympus (in jpeg). What happened to the RAW files?
I’d say from the JPEG, that the olympus was giving better results (when you zoom in) but then the image is a lot bigger. Something wrong with this test.
I love my DP1. I’m a pro but I don’t like to GEEK it about all the time. This is PORTABLE QUALITY.
Totally agree, love either DP offering for the IQ, and the portability too.
I agree with your conclusions overall, but the E-P1 is diffraction limited worse than even 10mp+ APS-C sensors. Ideally the test should have used the Olympus at around or below F/5.6. A bit of a downside really because I suspect many pancake and 4/3rd lens optimum sharpness would be around F/8 or above if not for the sensor pixel population.
Now, if Sigma or Fujifilm were to produce a 4/3rds camera with one of their sensors, boy do I think the lenses would benefit
. Although less pixels for the auto-corrections for the current batch of 4/3rds lenses. A 4/3rds Foveon or SuperCCD camera would be a killer app.
Apologies – I just re-read the article. Disregard my last post. Was reading a lot of reviews in different tabs and commented in the wrong place.
no problem… and thanks for dropping by!