Review: Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR

by Patrick on September 2, 2008

Nikon 18-105mm

Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR

Without missing a beat, SLRGear.com has posted their review of new Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR lens that will be included as the kit lens for the new Nikon D90. While usually it’s a good idea to approach the typical kit lens with a bit of caution, this one looks to be a good deal.

Perhaps the best word to describe the sharpness profile of the 18-105mm is ‘consistent’. With most zoom lenses, especially in the ”kit” category, the designer must juggle a variety of factors, not the least of which is the cost of the design. Frequently a lens will be a good wide-angle performer, only to suffer when used at full telephoto; or, vice versa. This is not the case with the 18-105mm, which shows excellent performance at all focal lengths.

-SLRGear.com

and…

The Nikon 18-105mm ƒ/3.5-5.6 definitely raises the bar for Nikon’s current lineup of kit lenses; consistently sharp, even at large apertures, with good resistance to chromatic aberration. Corner shading is prevalent, but it’s not a noticeable problem. Distortion is evident and irregular, but again, you’re probably only going to notice it if you need your straight lines to be absolutely straight.

-SLRGear.com

That sounds pretty good to me. As of now the Nikon D90 with kit lens is going for $1299 most places. By itself the Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR goes for $400 so that’s a $100 saving. As a stand alone purchase $400 isn’t bad, consider the Nikon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S DX goes for $350 or so with no VR. I’d expect the 2 have similar performance, so it’s all what you need, a little more length, or the benefits of VR?

While you’re deciding, go read the review…

(My advice: If you really want a good walkaround lens that covers all the bases reasonably well, the Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S DX VR does the job. You’ll need an additional $250, but you’ll save yourself a little money when you decide (which you will) 105mm just isn’t enough. Later fill in your collection with some specific niche type lenses: macro, 50mm prime, etc.)

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Eolake Stobblehouse Mac OS X Safari 525.20.1 09.02.08 at 5:16 pm

Thanks for posting this.

Your advice is good.
However, I own and love the 18-200mm, and while it’s a fantastic all-round lens, it’s a leeeettle bit soft in the corners at the long end if you don’t stop down. It’s probably nitpicking, but I have ordered this new lens anyway. (Smaller too.)

I’ve also ordered the Nikkor 85mm F:1.8, which I’m really looking forward to getting.

E M W Mac OS X Safari 525.20.1 09.02.08 at 6:33 pm

great advice, heh.

i started with a 18-55mm kit lens with my D50, now I have the Nikkor 18-200mm and a Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 prime in the bag. next buy will probably be a fisheye. i’d love an ultra wide, but cost quite a lot of £!

Patrick Mac OS X Mozilla Firefox 3.0.1 09.02.08 at 7:48 pm

Eolake,
it ain’t perfect, but gets you out of the house in a hurry, great first lens.

EMW, the Nikon wide will break the bank, but the Tokina 12-24 is about half the nikon, and reviews rather well (used it myself with fine results)

Eolake Stobblehouse Mac OS X Safari 525.20.1 09.03.08 at 8:20 am

I have a Tamron in about that range, which is very good, light, and not expensive.

Eolake Stobblehouse Mac OS X Safari 525.20.1 09.08.08 at 3:47 pm

Hey, when googling:
nikon 18-105mm samples
this page came up second.
Good for you.

Patrick Windows Vista Mozilla Firefox 3.0.1 09.08.08 at 4:16 pm

sometimes you get lucky :)

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>