Comments on: Panasonic LX3 review http://www.neutralday.com/panasonic-lx3-review/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:01:57 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Patrick http://www.neutralday.com/panasonic-lx3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-128 Patrick Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:30:43 +0000 http://www.neutralday.com/?p=646#comment-128 Guy, No problem, I'd been waiting for a review, but looking forward to an even more thorough going over ASAP. Also, your thoughts on the camera? Guy,

No problem, I’d been waiting for a review, but looking forward to an even more thorough going over ASAP.

Also, your thoughts on the camera?

]]> By: Guy Teague http://www.neutralday.com/panasonic-lx3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-127 Guy Teague Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:38:08 +0000 http://www.neutralday.com/?p=646#comment-127 tks for posting this, btw. i wonder why the reviewer repeated the panasonic statement verbatim that a f2.0 lens was 'about twice as bright' as an f2.8 lens. it's *exactly* twice as 'bright'--although that's a nonsense term as it is--it lets in exactly twice the amount of light. /guy tks for posting this, btw.

i wonder why the reviewer repeated the panasonic statement verbatim that a f2.0 lens was ‘about twice as bright’ as an f2.8 lens. it’s *exactly* twice as ‘bright’–although that’s a nonsense term as it is–it lets in exactly twice the amount of light.

/guy

]]>