Panasonic LX3 review
A very fair review courtesy of Mark Goldstein. Overall very favorable, but he does caution some common sense, and advises potential customers to hold off till Photokina finishes, which considering the outside chance of Canon introducing a G10 there, is probably a very good idea.
Lots of photos included, and it is clear that the LX3 struggles with noise once one goes beyond ISO 400, on the other hand, with the fast lens courtesy of Leica, LX3 shooters may be able to avoid having to crank that ISO. In addition, yes that wide angle looks good, but you are going to struggle some to take your average close up portrait type shots. As an artistic accessory, this camera will excel in pushing you creatively, but it might be a pass for the typical point and shooter (most of whom might be discouraged anyway by the “lack” of zoom).
Another big feature of the LX3 is the ability to shoot RAW, and while the author thoughtfully included some example RAW files, they are unfortunately not able to be opened in LR2, Aperture, or ACR, at least for me. Hopefully this is cleared up soon in the typical RAW updates provided by Adobe, as I’m anxious to see what one could pull out of the LX3.
I have to say, I’m still sold on the LX3 as a bridge type compact. It’s got a solid appearance, a lens tailor-made for creativity, impressive IQ for a compact, and it shoots RAW. With the handicaps of Sigma’s DP1 and Nikon’s P6000 crippled “RAW” (or worse for Mac shooters), it looks like all I have to do is wait to see what the G10 brings to the plate.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 review.
Continue the Discussion
|
Join us on Facebook! Become a fan of Neutralday today! Become a fan of Neutralday on Facebook. Interact with us and stay updated on what's coming next at Neutralday, photography news, and other fans' insights. Follow us on Twitter! Grab our tweets right here. Follow Neutralday on Twitter. Insights on the cameras we're reviewing, and frequent photography related news, thoughts, and links. Support Neutralday by shopping at our preferred retailer, B&H Photo |
Explore Similar Posts
- Now Posted: Our In Depth Review of the Fujifilm FineP…
- Now Posted: Our In Depth Review of the Panasonic Lumi…
- Now Posted: Our Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 In Depth Review
- Now Posted: Our Review of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7…
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 In Depth Review





















Apple 15″ Macbook Pro 2.66GHZ (Core i7) Review
Canon 10×42 L IS WP Binoculars In Depth Review
Canon 18×50 IS All Weather Binoculars In Depth Review
Canon EOS 1D Mark IV In Depth Review
Canon EOS 7D In Depth Review
Canon EOS Rebel T2i (550D) In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot G11 In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot S90 In Depth Review
Fujifilm FinePix Z700EXR In Depth Review
Nikon Coolpix P100 In Depth Review
Nikon D3000 In Depth Review
Nikon D300s In Depth Review
Nikon D3s In Depth Review
Olympus E-P2 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 In Depth Review
Pentax K-x In Depth Review
Pentax Optio I-10 Digital Compact Camera In Depth Review
Samsung NX10 In Depth Review
Sigma 150mm F2.8 EX APO DG HSM Macro Review
Sigma DP2s In Depth Review
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5V In Depth Review
Swarovski EL 10×42 SwaroVision Binoculars In Depth Review








tks for posting this, btw.
i wonder why the reviewer repeated the panasonic statement verbatim that a f2.0 lens was ‘about twice as bright’ as an f2.8 lens. it’s *exactly* twice as ‘bright’–although that’s a nonsense term as it is–it lets in exactly twice the amount of light.
/guy
Guy,
No problem, I’d been waiting for a review, but looking forward to an even more thorough going over ASAP.
Also, your thoughts on the camera?