Comments on: Panasonic LX3 Review: It’s Not Just the f/2

By: Patrick

Patrick — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:53:46 +0000

Noted and corrected!

By: Leonard Goh

Leonard Goh — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:20:25 +0000

Hi Editor,

Thank you for mentioning our review of the LX3 on your site. However, we’ve only given it an 8/10, instead of 9/10 as you’ve mentioned above. We would really appreciate it if you can make the necessary changes.

Thank you, and have a nice day!

By: Patrick

Patrick — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:57:57 +0000

Yes that f/2 is killing me as well, but I’m trying to hold out for that G10 announcement, hard when I’ve seen the LX3 for $399 a couple of times!

By: JH

JH — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:26:06 +0000

Thanks for pointing out this new review. Good grades! I’m also holding out for Canon G10 (the specs may have leaked) but I’m not sure if I can.

The dark Finnish autumn is approaching and f2.0 + high ISO in LX3 are hard to resist.