<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon Introduces AF-S DX-NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED Lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-introduces-af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-introduces-af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed-lens/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:51:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-introduces-af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2657</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=4714#comment-2657</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s how it is with the 17-35 for the canon as well, it&#039;s a major chunk of lens! Personally, I like the heft, but I can see it being a real drag for others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s how it is with the 17-35 for the canon as well, it&#8217;s a major chunk of lens! Personally, I like the heft, but I can see it being a real drag for others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eolake Stobblehouse</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-introduces-af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2656</link>
		<dc:creator>Eolake Stobblehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=4714#comment-2656</guid>
		<description>Years ago (with the Nikon D2x) I bought the pro 17-35mm lens, but I&#039;ve not used it much, it&#039;s just so dang big and heavy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago (with the Nikon D2x) I bought the pro 17-35mm lens, but I&#8217;ve not used it much, it&#8217;s just so dang big and heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eolake Stobblehouse</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-introduces-af-s-dx-nikkor-10-24mm-f35-45g-ed-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>Eolake Stobblehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=4714#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>Yes, this seems interesting to me. Could be high-performance. 

If you want cheaper, Tamron and Sigma have good wide zooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this seems interesting to me. Could be high-performance. </p>
<p>If you want cheaper, Tamron and Sigma have good wide zooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
