<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D900 Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d900-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d900-rumors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:01:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d900-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 14:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=448#comment-658</guid>
		<description>Ian, a modular system would be exciting, but is so speculative, I can&#039;t even begin to guess as to the format, although all I can imagine is the modular medium format style as you mentioned

ventidin, I, uhhh... don&#039;t really know how to respond to your comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, a modular system would be exciting, but is so speculative, I can&#8217;t even begin to guess as to the format, although all I can imagine is the modular medium format style as you mentioned</p>
<p>ventidin, I, uhhh&#8230; don&#8217;t really know how to respond to your comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ventidin</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d900-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>ventidin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=448#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Secondo il mio modesto parere l&#039;argomento è molto credibile, anzi possibile dal momento che 12 MP sul formato FX sono circa l&#039;equivalente di 7-8 MP sul DX, ecco che il rapporto MPixel-qualità torna senza smentite, cioè, 24 MP sul formato
FX sono circa 14-16 MP sul dormato DX,
un buon carico di qualità per le reflex attuali.

ora et labora</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secondo il mio modesto parere l&#8217;argomento è molto credibile, anzi possibile dal momento che 12 MP sul formato FX sono circa l&#8217;equivalente di 7-8 MP sul DX, ecco che il rapporto MPixel-qualità torna senza smentite, cioè, 24 MP sul formato<br />
FX sono circa 14-16 MP sul dormato DX,<br />
un buon carico di qualità per le reflex attuali.</p>
<p>ora et labora</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d900-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=448#comment-493</guid>
		<description>I myself had merely mused on the idea of a D900 with a higher megapixel count (the google search for which led me to this page in the first place) This was just based on what I had seen happening with the launch of so many new Dnubers on the nikon role call and the obvious need for that extra 12mp. But at no point had I considered a modular system because it just seems such and out of left field idea. I suppose it is this fact that makes me so excited about the idea. It would be a while before I could justify the expense, having just splashed out on a shiny new D300. But it would most deffinitely be justified eventually. What a world of possibilities that would open up. Would it be likely that this modular camera would follow the more obvious road of a medium format style modular system, or would they be more likely to do something else out of left field and have a smaller sensor housing attatch to the back of a more traditional SLR style body?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself had merely mused on the idea of a D900 with a higher megapixel count (the google search for which led me to this page in the first place) This was just based on what I had seen happening with the launch of so many new Dnubers on the nikon role call and the obvious need for that extra 12mp. But at no point had I considered a modular system because it just seems such and out of left field idea. I suppose it is this fact that makes me so excited about the idea. It would be a while before I could justify the expense, having just splashed out on a shiny new D300. But it would most deffinitely be justified eventually. What a world of possibilities that would open up. Would it be likely that this modular camera would follow the more obvious road of a medium format style modular system, or would they be more likely to do something else out of left field and have a smaller sensor housing attatch to the back of a more traditional SLR style body?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
