• Home
  • About
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail
  • Cameras
  • lenses
  • reviews
  • Rumors
  • Software

neutralday

Posted on July 22, 2008 - by Patrick

Nikon D700, our new favorite camera

Cameras

{ Nikon's D700 }

{ Nikon's D700 }

Honesty, what’s not to like?

For all practical purposes the D700 is a D3, but smaller (good!), cheaper (good!), and incapable of recording audio (who cares?). Yes there are some other differences, but real pros excluded, most could live without a few FPS, the integrated vertical grip, and battery differences. What the vast majority will be excited about clearly will be the ability to shoot with the D3’s internals and it’s substantial benefits  (ridiculous full frame image quality with amazing ISO performance and noise management).

Not suprisingly, I’ve yet to see real negative feedback in the early hands-on type reviews circulating, indeed a summary of all reviews could be achieved with the mathmatical formula  of  “D3-$2000″. And as if anybody needed a reminder, the D3 is nearing perfection (if reviews are to be believed).

Thus in need of further proof, or just needing someone to despise for actually having their hands on a D700, the Luminous Landscape folks have a review up on our new favorite camera, the Nikon D700. And yes you’ll be seeing passages like this:

At any sensitivity up to ISO 1600 there’s little of concern in terms of low noise. Uncanny. At ISO 3200 a slight bit of luminance noise appears, but it can be easily removed in post. ISO 6200 is still eminently usable, and even ISO 12,000 equivalent is acceptable for reportage. Truly amazing is that ISO 25,000 equivalent, though noisy, is no worse than Tri-X used to be at ISO 1,200.

Dynamic range and colour purity is first rate. The D700’s large 8 micron pixels ensure a very high signal to noise ratio and these clean pixels really allow for more ressing up when needed than one would think. I have made 24X36″ prints from the D3 that are hanging in my gallery alongside images taken with a 21 Megapixel 1Ds MKIII, and one has to struggle to determine that those from the D3 were done with nearly half the resolution of those from the Canon. Results from the D700 will be similar, but remember – to get the best from this or any camera takes optimum shooting technique.

quite frequently. You can get the review here.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 10:07 pm and is filed under Cameras. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

0 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



Leave a Comment

Here's your chance to speak.

  1. Name (required)

    Mail (required)

    Website

    Message

  • Ad Ad Ad Ad
  • Related Posts

    • I swear I’m not piling on, really I’m not. Another Nikon D300 review.
    • Nikon D700 Digital SLR Camera Review: Like a Nikon’s Greatest Hits Album
    • Nikon D90 Digital SLR with 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens Available Now.
    • Nikon vs. Canon - Harrington style.
    • Video Quality of the Nikon D90 Digital SLR Camera: Uniquely Cinematic
  • Recent Comments

    • Steve Shea on Canon 5D Replacement
    • Eolake Stobblehouse on Hmm…Something Looks Different?
    • Patrick on Hmm…Something Looks Different?
    • Eolake Stobblehouse on Hmm…Something Looks Different?
    • Eolake Stobblehouse on Hmm…Something Looks Different?
  • Featured News

    • 16 Spectacular Sunset Photographs (And How To Take Them) by Patrick on September 7, 2008
    • Nikon D90 Video Sample by Patrick on September 7, 2008
    • Hmm…Something Looks Different? by Patrick on September 6, 2008
    • Impressive High ISO Crops from Canon EOS 50D Digital SLR Camera by Patrick on September 5, 2008
  • We visit

    • 1000 Words Photography
    • 1001 Noisy Cameras
    • Art Candy
    • Brad Cockrell
    • Calikartel
    • Chromasia
    • Conscientious
    • Digital Photograph Review
    • Engadget
    • FFFFound
    • i heart photograph
    • Musings on Photography
    • Scott Kelby
    • Strobist
    • The Exposure Project