<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D700 against Nikon D300, Full Frame matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:31:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-7197</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-7197</guid>
		<description>Jim,
Well you got yourself two very nice cameras, not bad...I&#039;m sort of jealous. (don&#039;t tell my 5D2 though)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />
Well you got yourself two very nice cameras, not bad&#8230;I&#8217;m sort of jealous. (don&#8217;t tell my 5D2 though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-7196</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-7196</guid>
		<description>Tito, 
I don&#039;t know the answer to that, but wouldn&#039;t they have a D700s before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tito,<br />
I don&#8217;t know the answer to that, but wouldn&#8217;t they have a D700s before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-7189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-7189</guid>
		<description>Ok, after all I said I went and bought a D700.. My first impressions is that it makes my (beloved) D300 feel like a toy in comparison. Performance wise I haven&#039;t been disappointed so far, at 6400iso it is fairly smooth although not as grain-free as I was lead to believe. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll be going above 1600 but the 1600 is roughly as smooth as 400 on the D300.. What finally swung it as being able to use my wide zoom. That and the D300 for the reach seems a winning combo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, after all I said I went and bought a D700.. My first impressions is that it makes my (beloved) D300 feel like a toy in comparison. Performance wise I haven&#8217;t been disappointed so far, at 6400iso it is fairly smooth although not as grain-free as I was lead to believe. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll be going above 1600 but the 1600 is roughly as smooth as 400 on the D300.. What finally swung it as being able to use my wide zoom. That and the D300 for the reach seems a winning combo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tito</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-7188</link>
		<dc:creator>tito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-7188</guid>
		<description>Yes , I&#039;ll waiting for the next FX generation too, perhaps D800.
But when Nikon launch the next D800 series?,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes , I&#8217;ll waiting for the next FX generation too, perhaps D800.<br />
But when Nikon launch the next D800 series?,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-6706</guid>
		<description>Jim,
I&#039;d think it best to wait as well, you&#039;ll want the successor for sure I&#039;m thinking ( to the D700 that is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />
I&#8217;d think it best to wait as well, you&#8217;ll want the successor for sure I&#8217;m thinking ( to the D700 that is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-6681</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-6681</guid>
		<description>I second Ellis&#039; point. The lens makes more difference to the IQ than the sensor at ISO 200. In the test with the flowers when both used the 70-200 they were virtually identical, in fact the D300 image looked slightly sharper. I&#039;ve been struggling to decide whether it&#039;s worth upgrading my D300 and I&#039;ve concluded that the only reason for splashing out the 2k on the D700 would be for low light capability which doesn&#039;t seem enough. I&#039;m waiting for the D800..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Ellis&#8217; point. The lens makes more difference to the IQ than the sensor at ISO 200. In the test with the flowers when both used the 70-200 they were virtually identical, in fact the D300 image looked slightly sharper. I&#8217;ve been struggling to decide whether it&#8217;s worth upgrading my D300 and I&#8217;ve concluded that the only reason for splashing out the 2k on the D700 would be for low light capability which doesn&#8217;t seem enough. I&#8217;m waiting for the D800..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-6635</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-6635</guid>
		<description>You should put the same 17-55mm F2.8 ED on both D700 and D300 for the comparison test. Or the 24-70mm F2.8 G ED on both D700 and D300.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should put the same 17-55mm F2.8 ED on both D700 and D300 for the comparison test. Or the 24-70mm F2.8 G ED on both D700 and D300.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wedding photographer swansea</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-6489</link>
		<dc:creator>wedding photographer swansea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-6489</guid>
		<description>would you go with 3rd party glass is the question!! after buying a d3 or d700 LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would you go with 3rd party glass is the question!! after buying a d3 or d700 LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-5907</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-5907</guid>
		<description>I am confused about one of the comments here.  One commenter said that if I mounted the fx camera on a tripod and the dx camera on a tripod, I would see a difference in the image.  If there was a control comparison, what difference would this make??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused about one of the comments here.  One commenter said that if I mounted the fx camera on a tripod and the dx camera on a tripod, I would see a difference in the image.  If there was a control comparison, what difference would this make??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d700-against-nikon-d300-full-frame-matters/comment-page-2/#comment-5906</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=477#comment-5906</guid>
		<description>If you are willing to go with third party glass, Tamron makes a 28-300 image stabilizing lens for Nikon that would get you almost the equivalent of the 18-200 on the dx sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are willing to go with third party glass, Tamron makes a 28-300 image stabilizing lens for Nikon that would get you almost the equivalent of the 18-200 on the dx sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
