search the site
Nikon D5000 vs. Canon EOS Rebel T1i (500D): Best of the Entry Level DSLRs
With the announcement of the Nikon D5000 and the Canon EOS Rebel T1i (referred to here as the Canon 500D), entry-level consumers and prospective digital SLR camera purchasers now have 2 incredible choices from the number one an two camera manufacturers, both featuring the ability to shoot HD video, and both priced safely under $1000 with an included lens. Either camera would make a great first DSLR, but to help with the choosing (or perhaps to complicate it further) I’ve compiled some of the highs and lows of both cameras, as well as feature and specifications comparisons.
[Note: We've finished a comprehensive review of the Nikon D5000, available right here.]
The Nikon D5000 starts the race seemingly a bit behind the Canon 500D (at least on paper) with a 12.3 megapixel sensor, the same one in fact that Nikon uses in the D90. Like its bigger brother, the D5000 uses the same or at least very similar EXPEED processor and keeps its 12 bit A/D conversion which theoretically points to less dynamic range and color depth than provided by the Canon 500D’s 14 bit A/D. Meanwhile the Canon 500D borrows its sensor and processing from the Canon 50D, in other words a 15.1 megapixel sensor with 14 bit A/D conversion and DIGIC IV processing. The Nikon lists an ISO range of 200-3200 with a boost option of 100-6400, while the 500D lists an expanded ISO range of 100-12800. So given the specifications, we can safely assume the Canon 500D takes the better picture right? Probably not, and here’s why. If we work with the given ancestries of the 2 cameras, the Nikon D90 and the Canon 50D, its quite possible that the D5000 will meet or exceed the 500D in image quality (though in real world results the actual printed results will very likely be quite comparable). Using scores provided by DXOmark.com, the D90 has superior color depth, low light ISO, and dynamic range for an overall sensor score of 72 versus the Canon 50D’s 62.9. It’s true that the 500D does bring superior resolution to this challenge, but the very slight edge provided in image detail comes at the cost of additional noise at higher ISO sensitivities. In short when it comes to IQ, the numbers alone don’t tell the whole story and I suspect that overall, the Nikon D5000 compares quite favorably to the Canon 500D, and likely provides superior results at higher ISO.
Moving on to some other aspects of both cameras, the Nikon D5000 has a somewhat more advanced AF system using 11 points against the Canon 500D’s 9 point AF. Both utilize one center cross-hair type sensor, which typically means focusing and recomposing for best results. Both cameras also offer comparable AF area modes, and in general I suspect that the two camera are essentially equal to the task of getting sharp pictures. When it comes to live view, both camera have it and both use contrast detect for AF duties in live view. The Canon additionally offers phase detect, which normally is faster than contrast detect, but in practice on the Canon 500D, is still somewhat slow. Therefore, both cameras are somewhat slow to focus in live view, and as such, live view usage might best be used on a tripod. The edge though goes to the Canon 500D whose live view features are more robust with grid overlays, and zoom features, that when combined with its much higher resolution LCD display, allow for getting critical focus much easier.
Speaking of LCD displays, the 2 cameras have taken 2 distinct approaches. In the case of the 500D, Canon has provided a 920k resolution, 3 inch display that provides a very crisp and clear picture, ideal for analyzing photographs, viewing movies, and as mentioned before, achieving critical focus. The Nikon D5000 takes a totally different approach, and provides an articualting display that flip down and rotates. The resolution of the LCD is only 230K though, and is smaller in size at 2.7 inches. This articulated display obviously allows for more creative use of the Nikon D5000, especially when paired with shooting video. Unfortunately, it also might create some issues when used with a tripod due to the hinge location, and users will need to be careful in handling the camera, mindful of the positioning of the LCD relative to other surfaces.
Finally a few words on video. While the 500D does list 1080p as an option, just be aware that this of the 20 fps variety, in other words, playback may be less than smooth. Therefore in actual likely use, both cameras basically shoot 720p video, the Canon 500D at 30 fps, the Nikon D5000 at 24 fps. The Canon 500D has a time limit of nearly 30 minutes or 4 GB of data, while the Nikon D5000 shoots in HD for 5 minute clips. In reality though, since neither camera has AF once video begins, shooting video for longer than very short clips should be avoided. For now, video on a DSLR should be thought of as taking a moving picture and as such 5 minutes is more than enough time. Additionally– and unfortunately, neither camera records stereo sound nor anyway of capturing it via input — ala the Canon EOS 5D Mark II.
The superior camera? If fun factor is your main concern the Nikon D5000 certainly fits the bill. With built in image editing options, and the articulated LCD it seems ideal for a family looking to record trips, family events, and special occasions. On the other hand the Canon Rebel T1i (or 500D) seems ideal for the budding photographer ready to move up into the financial sink hole that is DSLR photography. With the ability to capture more detail, and beautifully large and crisp LCD display, it seems to take a more serious approach to taking great photos. More objectively though, either camera will likely lead to great results, and honestly it’s amazing what the camera makers are offering customers at this price point relative to just a couple of years ago.
Front View
click image to enlarge
Rear View
click image to enlarge
Sensor
pixels |
size |
cleaning |
|
Canon EOS T1i/ 500D |
|
|
|
Nikon D5000 |
|
|
|
File Sizes/File Formats/Video
image size |
formats |
Video |
|
Canon EOS T1i/ 500D |
|
|
|
Nikon D5000 |
|
|
|
Processing/AF Points/AF Modes
Processing |
AF Points |
AF Modes |
|
Canon EOS T1i/ 500D |
|
|
|
Nikon D5000 |
|
|
|
Viewfinder/Display
Viewfinder |
LCD Size |
LCD Resolution |
|
Canon EOS T1i/ 500D |
|
|
|
Nikon D5000 |
|
|
|
FPS/ISO/Live View
FPS |
ISO |
Live View |
|
Canon EOS T1i/ 500D |
|
|
|
Nikon D5000 |
|
|
|
Dimensions/Weight/Price
Dimensions |
Weight |
Price |
|
Canon EOS T1i/ 500D |
|
|
|
Nikon D5000 |
|
|
For a direct image quality comparison of the 2 cameras, head no further than Imaging Resource’s invaluable “Comparometer”. You’ll note the additional detail captured by the Canon 500D, and for the most part very close ISO performance.
(Note: We’re reviewing the Nikon D5000 right now and have posted some early analysis and ISO samples here)
Got an opinion? Love to hear it in the comments!
The Canon EOS Rebel T1i is available for order:
or check prices at Amazon, B&H Photo, Adorama.
Nikon D5000:
pre-order at Amazon
Continue the Discussion
|
Join us on Facebook! Become a fan of Neutralday today! Become a fan of Neutralday on Facebook. Interact with us and stay updated on what's coming next at Neutralday, photography news, and other fans' insights.
Follow us on Twitter! Grab our tweets right here. Follow Neutralday on Twitter. Insights on the cameras we're reviewing, and frequent photography related news, thoughts, and links.
Support Neutralday by shopping at our preferred retailer, B&H Photo |
Explore Similar Posts
- Canon EOS 60D In the Wild?
- Canon EOS Rebel T2i (550D) In Depth Review
- Canon EOS Rebel T2i (550D) vs. EOS Rebel T1i (500D) v…
- Canon Introduces EOS 60D: 18 MP, Articulated LCD, $1099
- DxOMark Publishes New Data For Nikon D300s and Sony A…
Leave a Reply
About Neutralday.com
Established in 2007 by photographer Patrick Dean, Neutralday.com brings you the latest in photography news and reviews. With insights on photographers, equipment, and how to's, Neutralday.com is focused on and intended for the photography community.
Support Neutralday.com
Our Most Recent Reviews
Apple 15″ Macbook Pro 2.66GHZ (Core i7) Review
Canon 10×42 L IS WP Binoculars In Depth Review
Canon 18×50 IS All Weather Binoculars In Depth Review
Canon EOS 1D Mark IV In Depth Review
Canon EOS 7D In Depth Review
Canon EOS Rebel T2i (550D) In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot G11 In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot S90 In Depth Review
Fujifilm FinePix Z700EXR In Depth Review
Nikon Coolpix P100 In Depth Review
Nikon D3000 In Depth Review
Nikon D300s In Depth Review
Nikon D3s In Depth Review
Olympus E-P2 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 In Depth Review
Pentax K-x In Depth Review
Pentax Optio I-10 Digital Compact Camera In Depth Review
Samsung NX10 In Depth Review
Sigma 150mm F2.8 EX APO DG HSM Macro Review
Sigma DP2s In Depth Review
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5V In Depth Review
Swarovski EL 10×42 SwaroVision Binoculars In Depth Review
Get The Hottest Cameras
Latest Tweets
resources
Best Sellers at Amazon
flickr
That’s it! two manufacturer are equally good!
i am planning to buy my 1st slr cam and i hav sorted out three models canon 450d,canon 500d and nikon d5000
plz suggest me whih will be bttr
i like the canon 500d but i ws leanin a bit towrds d5000
plz suggest me m vry confused
You cannot go wrong with any of those. I bought canpn 500d and have been extremely happy with the result. So it is upto you. Nikon has a screen which will twist around for Live View but Canon has a Depth of Field preview which canon does not. SO either one are good. I went with Canon for the DOF preview which I wanted plus the higher pixels plus the HD Video. Nikon shoots at 4 fos compared to 3.4 for Canon but Canon has higher ISO capability allowing you to take pictures in extremely low light. You cannot go wrong with the quality of pictures. It is just what is more important for you….
i don’t get it. the d5000 trumps the canon in almost every respect… image quality, af sensors, low light performance, dynamic range. what confuses me is why the d5000 is to non-professional/”fun factor” use. wouldn’t a professional need a camera with good dynamic range, high iso perf., image quality… the fully articulating display screen is also a great advantage for journalists and paparazzi i might say.
having 3 extra mega-pixels and a bigger screen is “a serious approach to taking great photos?” give me a break.
gerri,
“trumps” might be going too far for me. I find them very close—likely equal printed. My subjective take isn’t based on specs. regardless, more perception based on camera setup etc.
The Canon can take more detailed pictures, features a significantly more photographer friendly LCD (”professional” grade)–it isn’t just bigger it’s very high-res. That makes a bigger difference in my mind than articulation in the field or in the studio, but that’s just “MY” take on things….but I love hearing different opinions too…:)
Further I’m expecting to review both of these cameras myself—and it may turn out your take is correct.
I absolutely agree with Gerri’s comment!! this review was good.. but the conclusion totally screwed it up.. !! good analysis.. but very bad inference!!
Why? I do not agree with Gerri’s use of the word “trumps”, maybe “shaded” would have been better based on the review. As you said it was a good review and I for one thought it was very objective. In the conclusion, the reviewer added his personal taste/preference into it. He also made a big deal of the high res LCD and other points that Gerri didn’t mention and perhaps places more weight on those differences or thought there was a bigger gap between the two on those particular points?
I should also add that based on this review and others, I was going to buy one of these cameras based on the one that felt good when I picked it up. That was until I found out I could get the Canon with my frequent flyer points. Now there is an $800 premium for the Nikon, so no contest
That does make it easier, but I will say the D5000 feels better in the hands, but they usually do IMHO. Still you’re making a good choice.
I think the LCD is a big difference (for photographers), if you factor that with lens prices and other intangibles, and given that printed results are going to be darn near equal…
Well, I could be wrong…We’ll be reviewing the D5000 starting next week, but to be clear they market the camera in the way I’ve concluded, with a focus more on being a “family camera” than a “photographer’s camera”…but we’ll see.
Anyone who says the Nikon “Trumps” the Canon clearly has A) either a screw loose
Or more likely B) hasn’t used both.
Or Possibly C) is a Nikon fan and can’t see beyond them.
Serously people there both OK cameras. But thats all they are. nit picking about about bigger screens, better af better high iso. Your splitting hairs. Btw the canon AF is much faster with the usm lenses but on this body hardly makes any difference
Both cameras have their good and bad points. As for video ? waste of time in my opinion.
For some reason most people who own these type of camera will only ever use about 10% of the features that are available and most will never delve into the finer points of the menu.
Perhaps Nikon and Canon should spend more money on making the bodies feel better (less plastic) and the screens brighter. And generally the camera more useable to someone who doesn’t know how to use one.
I definitely agree that it is basically a toss up between the two cameras, best to get them in your hands at a big box store, and see which one feels better, while examining lens libraries, and potential upgrade paths, if the lens cost/selection fits, and you see a camera that you’d like to move up to one day, and the camera itself “feels” right, get it!
long live canon. they got HD. they have bigger LCD. they’re lighter. higher iso.
Canoner,
So I’m guessing you’re a fan?
i’m not really a fan, i just hate orthodox people who keep saying nikon is the best. blind faith that is.
thx for sharing this article
Brand loyalty can lead to irrational gushing, to be sure
So your direct response is orthodoxically calling canon the best with blind faith?
As far as I know, there are probably more Canon orthodoxy dudes out there tha any other brand.
I tend to agree with Gerri,
The d5000 appears to be more than an entry level dslr. When it comes down to it, it offers quality – low noise in low light, high res – (12.3 is easily enough on a small sensor) vivid colour and ease of use. The only downside I can see is the absence of the built in AF motor, but what does that matter unless you really hate manual focussing prime lenses. Personally, I like that it forces you to use manual focus occasionally.
Basically, for this to be an ‘entry level’, the soon-to-arrive mid range Nikons must be something very special.
I would say “entry level” as in that’s what they call it, but the term is losing relevance in terms of capabilities and points more to pricing.
i am planning to buy my 1st slr cam and i hav sorted out three models canon 450d,canon 500d and nikon d5000
plz suggest me whih will be bttr
i like the canon 500d but i ws leanin a bit towrds d5000
plz suggest me
well said johnny!!
i have been using canon, nikon and olympus slr. sorry to say to my professionalism, i still prefer canon to has more crispier pictures. but i still love my nikon and olympus.
stick to one dude…u r making mess here..then all da cameras in da world are good
so what is the best for professional nikon or canon?. some people said that image from nikon is more bold in color, and canon if more soft??
for professionals?… canon.
nangkri,
Between these 2 cameras? I’d say the Canon, but end results will be quite close. But really for professional use, you’ll really want to consider moving upwards a bit, D300, or 50D territory…
When I upgraded from P&S to DSLR last April09, I changed my decision at the last moment. For the previous 2 months I was leaning towards Nikon, mainly due to influence of so many Nikon lovers. I was contemplating a Nikon D90, it was very new at that time and read so many lavish praises on the net. Same time I was analyzing Canon EOS 450D as well.
But then, I decided to explore a bit more and check the global trend. Whenever I checked the highest selling DSLR list, a Canon always sat at the top. This made me ponder why? So, penetrated deeper and found some startling features that are bound to influence your thinking. I have summarized them here:
a. Nikon produces vivid colors and most images are presentable in jpeg format but Canon turns out some colors rather dull. May be RAW captures eliminates this bottleneck.
b. Nikon offers higher ISO than similar models of Canon and produces smooth images at high ISOs. Canon offers little lower range ISO but the entire range is very usable. Noise creeps in at high ISOs on both but Nikon smoothens them at the cost of clarity. Canon shows them more but more details are also retained.
c. Nikon offers little more frame rate in burst mode but as a nature photographer I don’t need that. For shooting wildlife and birds, Canon’s 3.5 fps is sufficient enough for me.
d. Nikon D90 incorporates video option but again I don’t need that as I was out for buying a still camera – not a camcorder. Moreover, when I need serious video recording, that toy video option of D90 will become a liability. In such case camcorder is a must.
e. So, Nikon D90 costs approximately 500 dollars more than Canon 450D mainly due to inclusion of a virtually useless video option.
Now, I know why Canon 450D is still (June09) the highest selling DSLR in the world because I am a proud owner of one.
I know Nikoninans will hurl into dozens of counter logics but, I’ll let them be happy with their gears and ask them to let me enjoy mine.
Both cameras are fairly low rent plastic bodies. It really depends on how your going to test them. For a start the kit lens can go in the bin as there both crap (the nikon possibbly having the edge). If you put a decent lens like a 100mm/105mm macro lens and shoot in raw then do a bit of work in photoshop I have a good feeling the Canon will come out on top. I have owned both Nikons and Canons so try not to be biased.
Having said that my ageing Canon 40d is only 10mp but takes better pictures in my opinion than the 50d, mp’s arn’t everything.
How far are you prepared to go ? If you want a point and shoot buy the Nikon (or a compact) but if you want the system Canon takes some beating. The lenses are generally sharper (like for like) and their L glass is supurb .
So if you have no lenses and intend getting “serious” get a Canon. If you just want great pictures off camera as jpegs and maybe a couple of cheap zoom lenses then the Nikon is proberbly the best bet.
d5000 looks great, but its biggest disadvantage is that it is not compatible with MOST nikkor lenses (- read AF)
the canon on the other hand will AF with ALL EF lenses produced since 89 – thats a huge deal imo hence the comment about d5000 for fun and 500d for people who want to get more interested in photography makes sense.
a 50 1.8 will autofocus on the canon – no 50 1.8 will AF on the nikon. yes there is the more expensive newer 50 1.4 G from nikon but then the whole nikon package becomes much more expensive that canon
i was convincing a friend to buy the 500d over the nikon for just this reason – lcd image quality etc etc are too close to say either one is significantly better, but when it comes to lenses – compatibility as well as price canon is a significantly better choice imho
I’m very happy to read all of your suggestion and comment with 2 cameras, I want to buy a camera but Im still confuse what will I buy. I love taking picture, most specially natures my sister introduce me canon 450d, and I kinda like it and I saw 500d, I’m still checking some brand of cameras. I want the best camera. Can any one of u guys advice me which brand I will buy. I consider canon and nikon but I can’t fix my mind which brand. It’s look like little difference in both part. Please I need advice. Thane in advance
Canon or Nikon, wow this is a hard one. Budget is important, but this battle is as old as time. I’m leaning towards the 500D because of the high res LCD, but a few more bucks gets you a D90, which I highly recommend. Really either one of the cameras on this page will bring great results. I know that doesn’t really help does it?
If you can afford it get one of the last 40d’s before they all dissapear. They may look crap on paper compared to the latest entry level bodies but go pick one up and take a few pictures. ^.5 fps is a dream when you need it and the resonse is instantanious. Cast magnisium body too so will last a good few years. If you shop around you’ll find it for about the same price as the 500d (maybe 50-100 quid more) I honestly think you’d be crazy to spend that sort of money on a 500d/d5000 yet for not much more you can have real camera.
@apple, I think both are great cameras as it is evident from the number of fans and users. Probably, Canon has an edge in lenses. The wide variety of lenses Canon offers gives u array of choices to suit diversified situations and budgets as well. Although I’m a Canonian but I’m convinced u can choose from either Canon 450D/500D or Nikon D5000/D90. All these are entry level gears but it’s unclear to me why Nikons are a little more pricey.
I have an old Nikon SLR 80 and Sigma lenses and Nokon Speed Light. Now I wonder can these lenses and Speed light fit to D5000? TIA
Reading this review is quite strange. After telling us that the D5000 has a superior AF, High ISO performance, dynamic range,etc we are being told that it is a ‘fun camera’? Does it tell jokes also? I don’t understand. What is the comparison based on?
Albert, that’s my subjective sense, in part based on how Nikon markets the camera. As I said, final results will be very similar. Fun isn’t a bad thing by the way, for example the Olympus E-620 is more fun than my 5D Mark II… not judging the outcomes, just the experience.
Hi, first time here. IMlooking to buy my first SLR. The buzz aroundd here is Canon T1i and Nikon D5000…But do Olympus, Sony(minolta?)and Pentax compare to these models?
Martin,
In my opinion the Pentax K-x definitely competes here so long as your fine with AA batteries. Sony and Olympus skip out on the video options, but are solid offerings. Sort of depends on your skill level and likely use.
No one in their right mind would spend this sort of money and stick AA batteries in it. A contender ? no way. Very little in the way of a decent system compared to Nikon/ Canon. Lenses are generally crap like for like. I know as I have seen the results from thier zooms. Maybe they make some nice primes, but how many ?
If you want video go and buy a video camera. I really can’t imagine many people using an slr for video once the novelty has worn off.
As for Sony/Olympus ? they make some nice cameras but as I keep pointing out they back it up with very little in the way of class glass or accesories. Forget them unless you want a point and shoot for holidays etc.
I thought the idea of these sort of sites was to educate people about whats available for photographers. whilst just about everyone makes a really good camera (it’s not that hard these days)
The rest of the system makes them little more than gloryfied toys. Good toys but toys all the same.
I’m supprised Patrick would even sugest such tosh to someone who is half serious about taking pictures for a hobby (or a living) Has anyone seen a pro with anything other than a Nikon or Canon round their neck who isn’t brain damaged ? thought not.
Patrick,
It wasn’t my intention to offend anyone (especially you) As you say the majority of people will use the kit lens and maybe a third party zoom. I have no problem with this whatsoever. Ansel Adams is one of my all time favorite photographers and his equipment was incredibly basic. I stand corrected if you say Pentax/Olympus/Sony make nice primes (athough I personally haven’t seen anything from sony) I guess they are all big boys toys. However I still stand by what I say that if you are going to get “serious” there are only really 2 choices Nikon vs Canon.
Having said that I would love a bronica with a digital back for studio work.
Likewise the Leica digital slrs and the gorgeous lenses but at what price ?
I guess money no object there are a few choices. btw I have had olypus/minolta nikon/pentax film cameras and only one canon digital slr (a 40 d) I don’t think I’m biased as far as makers are concerned but I do think you would have to go a long way to beat my 40d for what I paid for it (£650 with a 17-85)
I have compared it with just about every camera under a grand and can honestly say I wouldn’t swap it for any of them. some may have the edge in some areas but as an overall package (plus it’s damn fast) it ’s no contest.
All this is my opinion of course and everyone is entitled to one. I have even said that if your not that interested in adding more than a zoom and a flash there are proberbly better cameras. I just like my metal bodied heavy and some would say cumbersome canon. Each to their own.
What do other people thin of rival cameras from Pentax/ Olympus/ Sony. But please show me a camera that can take 800 shots at 6.5 fps with AA batteries ?????
I’ve never taken picture with a Nikon, I bought a Canon 500D over a d5000 a couple of month ago. At the beginning it is hell! as a fresher in the dslr world and considering the price of it you look for the best one! but after reading( book and web sites), I’ve chosen canon
1)handling, I believe it is the most important one, I tried the d90 the d5000 and my canon was the best according to me, some might like something else
2)the lens compatibility, it helps in a budget point of view
3)speed, in manual mode most critical functions have a dedicated button(iso, aperture…) I might be a beginner but that counts to be fast and have time to change the settings after you exposure is mediocre especially for priceless moments!
4)size and weight, the canon is almost 100gr lighter and smaller!coming from point and shoot, I wasn’t ready for that bulk piece!
5)software, The canon comes with a load which is compatible with mac!
6)screen resolution, 920.000dots gives you a very accurate preview of what you are going to see on you computer screen
to conclude I can just say if you are talking only about image quality i don’t think the difference will be visible, but there is a lot of other features which must be taken in consideration, mine were fulfilled by the canon
ps: don’t forget, after you bought your camera and a couple of lenses, you are more likely to be stuck with the same brand, unless you have proportional means, you’ll look to keep the same lenses for the next camera!
Silk,
Yeah, I think you made a good choice here, and you’ve got some good point, especially the last one. I know I’ll be getting one for review someday soon, and I’m excited to see what it can do myself!
Thanks guys for the the personal reviews! previously i was closure to buy Nikon D5000 now mu head messed up:)
I’ve 70-300 nikkor lense but if I buy D5000 my old lense will be useless!! If I buy D90 it’s price is high just because of video recording that’s Im not interested, agreed with Quazi Ahmed Hussain’s comment.
I’m not Nikonean or Canonian, I also have normal Fuji & Kodak cams.but right now my mind set on Canon eos500d…let’s see how far it’d remain on that.
JD,
the price of the D90 isn’t all that high if you search around, and it is a very good camera.
hello i am using sony ex1 xdcam ex for shooting some videos and wanna keep that pro level better and lighter so i am looking for shooting hd in one of those two dslr , but while shooting some scenes with canon 650is i found out that there is red rendering while shooting toward the sunset so i frequently asked at the dealer about rendering he said its available in all canon dslr , so what about d5000? , i need to choose so please help me my friends. thank you
alkhashti,
wow. That’s a question I won’t be able to answer for you but hopefully a kind commenter may be able to…
I bought a Nikon D5000. I was about to buy Canon 500d but when I went to the camera shop to check out some photos for comparison (same settings and all) Nikon’s output is better than Canon’s. I
fotoloco,
Is this viewing on the back of the camera, via prints, or on a computer…and regardless, are you liking the D5000?
in my opinion the pic Quality is better with nikkon but how about the video in HD mode
I don’t know because I don’t have either… but the D5000 films at 720p at 24 frames per sec whilst the Canon can shoot the same 720p at 30 frames per second. The Canon can also shoot 1080p but only at a choppy 20 frames per sec.
What I find confusing is that instead of referring to the resolution of the LCD, Canon puts the number of ‘dots’ in the specs. As you may know LCD pixels are constructed of three subpixels for each color (R, G and B).
So I figure that I should divide the Canon’s number of 920,000 dots by three to get the actual pixels?
Nikon actually states 230.000 pixels on the spec sheet of the D5000 so it is not far off of Canon’s 300,000+ pixels…
Or Canon means pixels when specifing ‘dots’, and then it has a truly remarkable display.
Did someone compared both displays?
Can someone specify the actual resolution of both LCD panels?
zakalwe,
the 500D does have the superior LCD, no question.
Can I just point out that if anyone is interested in macro to bear in mind the live veiw on the Canon is superb. You can see the depth of field (without the screen going dark) and maginfy a prtion (up to 10x) for very acurate focusing. Also in live view mode 1 or 2 the mirror is locked up and the exposure on the screen is directly off the ccd so you can compensatate for + – ev. Fantsstic for macro.
Does anyone know if the Nikon can come close to this sort of manipulation for macro ?
If not then that would be another reason (perhaps) to choose Canon.
I know not many people shoot macro but I thought I would mention it. So far as I know the Nikon’s mirror does not lock up in live veiw mode (or whatever Nikon calls their version) This is very important in macro as any camera shake is maginfied.
Hope this helps someone. Would be very interested to here from a Nikon man/woman how Nikon deals with macro/live veiw.
James,
Canon definitely has an edge in rendering magnified views in Live View. Don’t know why, but all the Nikons look a little fuzzy when zoomed in, even the D90 and D300s.
Help! I have purchased a N. D5000 due to being on sale and the package I obtained. Now the 500D is on sale however not with the same package. The one thing I am leary about is the recall on the Nikon. As I understand it (I have called Nikon and read things on their site) they whole camera will shut down for no reason and the part they will replace will correct the situation. That doesn’t leave me whole lot of options with I am in England/Ireland on vacation! As an amature (had a Cannon old 35 mm and loved it) to the DSLR world what do I do? Is it worth my time to exchange the cameras and purchase another lens or just stick with my D5000? I thought I made a decision but the lens compatibility is now making me lean towards the 500D. What should I do…please someone tell me!!!! LOL…help!
J,
I don’t know what to say, both cameras are nearly equally capable, but if you have a preference for the Canon lenses…better to switch now.
Well, i plan to buy one of these SRLs, i have read several reviews with examples and all, and is easy to realize that the Canon is a better photo camera. Nikon’s seem nicer by the outside, but at the end we are talking about the photo’s right?
sc,
I’d tend to agree with you, though printed results will be pretty much the same
hi, i am a newbie in photography yet have great interest in it. i was considering either one of these two as my first SLR and i cant make up my mind.
If it were me, I’d get the Rebel T1i, though I think the Nikon feels better, I’d prefer the Rebel, great LCD, and arguably for a newbie a cheaper way in (given lens selection/prices) . If the choice was a Nikon D90 (price is coming down all the time) and Rebel T1i—get the Nikon D90.
Patrick, I have never owned or used a DSLR and I have the chance to get either the 450D or 500D for nothing using my frequent flyer points. Both are twin lens kits and come with EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS and EF-S55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS. The video on the 500D is not a big deal for me, nor is the higher ISO options but the LCD sounds like a good upgrade. I have read that in pure image quality the lower MP 450D might actually be very slightly better in low light etc?
I guess my question is that if you were a newbie to DSLR and could have one of them for nothing – which one would you choose?
catlike,
definitely the 500D.
thanks
Hello, I am also a newbie in photography and wish to purchase my first dSLR. This page has been very useful for me since it talks about the cameras I have as options. From what I’ve read, can we say that:
Nikon D90 > Rebel T1i > Nikon D5000 ? I mean I know that there are lots of things to have in mind when rating a camera, but I feel that would be a fair judging from what I’ve read. Thanks for the help
Santiago,
that’s how I would sum it up…but again…printed on paper the differences between the 3 are negligible. But a D90 has some perks that the other don’t, top-side LCD for one, better build, etc.
Srely the D90 is in the same price range as the 50d (although I still think the 40d is better and cheaper) This is going away from the entry level cameras.
As a test I noticed a visable improvement by setting my camera to landscape mode (something I don’t normally do) As it sharpens the image and saturation. This produces noticably sharper prints at A4. I suppose you could leave the camera at this setting as I did for the day and get rid of the naturally softish images off camera. Considering most people who buy a 500d / d5000 are not going to much post processing this might be worth doing in camera, particually those who thinks the canon looks a bit soft.
Hello,
d5000 vs 500d?
I am officially overwhelmed with all the reviews and comparison sites – thought that my decision will be easy but it is not. At all!
both cameras are good way of me starting the adventure with photography – but what i should take on account making the final decision. Or even better – what should I choose?
What is your suggestion?
go with your gut, and what you need, and where you’ll go (with your photography). Again, printed on paper there will be virtually no difference. Consider things like lens pricing and selection, etc. If you can guess at your next step, say macro, then look at those lens options maybe that helps a bit.
I think it becomes much easier if you have lots of money LOL. A nice Canon 1ds mk3 and about 20 grands worth of nice L glass. And a Bronica medium format with a digital back and the same money spend on glass LOL
Patrics right though. Go and play with them and buy what you feel (you will not notice any difference in prints) Prices of lenses are prety much the same like for like although a standard 50mm canon will work on the digital bodies the same Nikor will not AF. It makes a nice 85mm f1.8 equivalent for about £70-80 for portraits.
All good lenses are expensive. The only possible exception is a standard 50mm canon which is silly cheap for the quality.
I must admit the cheaper Nikons feel slightly better made a creak a bit less than the Canons but that said I know loads of people who shoot with both and have heard of very few problems apart from one guy who lent his camera to someone and they tried to jam AA bateries in it when the battery went flat (I know, don’t ask)
I spent a lot of time and energy to deside which will be my first DSLR. Finally, I decided that I will go for Cannon 500D. I am getting it for $784 with 4 GB Sandisk SD card, I think its a nice deal.
a1Newbie,
Oh that’s good, good choice. I hope you come back and let everybody know how the camera is!
I just bought the Canon 500 but my sister swears by the Nikon D90. Now my question is and the reason I bought the camera in the first place is take sports shots of the kids in their last years of school. Which camera is better for action shots both in doors and out doors and which long range lens. I can still take back the Canon 500 so I need help pretty fast.
Your not comparing like with like. Here in the UK the D90 is much more expensive than the d5000 or 500D.
Hello everyone.. this has been a really nice discussion topic,,more interesting to me as i am also in the verge of buying either of D90, D5000 OR 500D..I am completely new to photography but offlate hv been trying to understand various concepts..Whic one would you suggest of the 3? pls advise..thanks
Hi giys,
If your going to print at A4 or smaller you’ll notice no difference between any of these cameras (at least with the kit lens anyway) If you have no lenses then just go with what feels right. However I must stress I think there is a better camera for around the same money. It’s the canon 40d and there selling out fast. Only 10pm I here you say ? Well go and try one and fire 60 frames at 6.3 frames a second and print one pioture and put it next to one of the 15mp cameras (notice any difference ? ).
Snap one up while there’s still some left is the best advice I can give anyone. It will put a smile on your face. Only problem is it’s heavy compared to these plastic bodies but in years to come you’ll know you made the right choice.
Ok you’ll pay a very small premium over the others mentioned here and I know it’s meant to be a 500d vs d5000 but what I’m trying to say is don’t be torn between two new kids on the block when the daddys not much more money.
If you want a general rule it’s Nikon for studio and landscape (off camera) and Canon for sports. I use Canon but I’m not biased as most of my film cameras were Nikon (mostly FM2’s) I just think Canons lens lineup and accesories are just a little better than Nikon (for digital) plus the old ef lenses fit all the digital too so if you allready have a canon that would be the way to go. But between the 500d and the d5000 you really are splitting hairs to notice any difference.
So if your serious or think you might become go buy a Canon 40d. A classic you won’t regret buying.
Hi Patrick,
I want to get back to a question that Lisa asked earlier, and that was about taking sports shots.
I know that a Canon 40D would be ideal at 6.5fps and the Nikon D90 at 4.5fps is OK, but for those of us who cannot afford a 40D or D90, and are considering the 500D or D5000, which of these two cameras would provide the best performance for sports.
I know the 500D is rated at 3.4fps and the D5000 is rated at 4.0fps, but I think there are other factors that impact overall performance, right?
Can you please suggest which camera, the 500D or D5000, you would choose for sports, ie. football, basketball, baseball?
Thank you.
John, that’s a tough question, for the most part I dont think there would be a big difference, but you’ll need a better, longer, faster lens than what’s supplied, so perhaps starting with the lens selection first, then coming back to the camera might help.
To James…
You are obviously very experienced with the Canon 40D. I have read reviews and it is an outstanding camera, as you suggest.
The only downside is how many reviews I’ve read where people experience ERR 99 with a new 40D. This ERR doesn’t allow their camera to work.
Are you familiar with the ERR, how serious it is and what the solution is? I’m looking at one from an online retailer and the last thing I want is to experience an ERR right off and have to deal with servicing it.
There was also a couple of reviews I read which spoke about a busy sign on the LCD that locked up the camera.
Can you please provide information on both of those issues?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi John,
Never had either issue you speak of personally but have helped a few people solve the issue so am well aware of it. First off a firmware update will solve 90% of the error and lockup issues. The other 10% are generally caused by a) certain makes of CF cards (in certain sizes) That said I have both sandisk ultra 111 8gb (highly recomended) and the Kinston equivalent of the same size.
The only other cause is by using Sigma and some older third party lenses. Sigma don’t have a licence to produce lenses for canon mounts so reverse engineer the electronics on their lenses. This is a common error 99 issue. Having said that I used a Sigma 180mm Macro with no issues.
I saw a canon 40d with the 17-85mm on ebay (thats where I got mine and if your careful and make sure it’s brand new uk stock is no problem) for £625. At this price I may buy another one.
So if you can live without the video ?????
And the 15 MP ?
And the plastic ?
It comes highly recomended. Don’t forget that if someone has an issue with something they write about it everywhere and if they don’t they normally say nothing. There must be an awful lot of Canon 40d owners who have never had an issue then, me included.
Anyway I personally (no dissrespect) think you would be a fool to choose the 500d over the 40d.
regards
james
Oh and John,
The long USM L lenses focus quicker than you can blink. They normally have 2 focus distaces for faster AF. Even my 70-200 f4 L is very, very fast
except when the light goes down. The standard 17-85 isn’t a great lens (it’s good but not great) especially at the wide end but unless your doing some serious cropping or printing anything bigger than A4 then I doubt anyone will notice. Unless of course you put the print next to one taken with “L” glass.
James
John,
Have just found out there were a batch of dodgy shutter units fitted to some 40d’s This also caused the err99 error you were talking about. Fortunately if you have one of these it will fail shortly after purchase so will be replaaced by Canon.
I only found this out after much digging when you mentioned the problem. But as I say ther’s an aweful lot of us 40d owners who have never had an issue (do you know how many they sold ?)
Take care
james
I still confused about canon 500d and nikon d5000, which one the greatest actually. I consider nikon because my buddies are all nikonian, but still I don’t know whether d5000 or 500d suits me best, i need an advice to learn more about choosing the right dslr for myself.
There’s always going to be better bodies in a year, but…
Lenses make the camera. I’d rather have an old rebel with $5k in lenses than a 1Ds Mk IV with a kit lens.
Obviously you don’t already own $5k in lenses or else you wouldn’t be asking which to purchase. I went Canon because of the variety of lenses owned by my family / friends and this helped my build an appropriate set based on what I need at the time. (Also, its nice to have a community of people to borrow from or to buy/trade unwanted lenses.) You should probably go Nikon b/c of your buddies IMHO.
I’ve owned both Nikon and Canon DSLR’s and obviously there were differences between them all, but no difference that was so substantial (within the same price point) that made me smack my head wishing that I had the other camera with me.
Also, are you choosing this camera based on specs and opinions? You should probably pick them both up in a store… Test drive the car before you buy it.
For the record, I vote 500D
ttang,
good advice, though I’d take the 1ds Mark IV.
hi guys, i’m going to get my 1st DSLR, well i do love canon 500d but i’m not saying nikon D5000 is not as good as canon. i do need help as i’ll be using it for 70% photographing and 30video-ing. I saw some video clips of nikon D50, i’m satisfying with the quality. On top of that, which camera suit me the most, well, i heard video-ing may hurt the machine, is that true?
Sanyu,
You’re in the same boat as a lot of folks here. Again, I’d ask what lenses you may want to use in the future, how much are they, and which camera company offers cameras above these models that might appeal to you 1 or 2 years from now. Then handle each camera, and get the one that fits the best. These 2 are so close but have a key difference. Flip out LCD is great for video, and possibly live view use, while a 920k display on the canon has it’s own appeal. IQ is going to be roughly the same. To me the nikon feels better. Tough decision…
hi! i read a lot of reviews but im still confused which of the two dslr camera i am going to buy. my choice is between canon 500d and nikon d5000. any suggestion? my friend told me, if i will choose canon i must buy EF 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6 rather than EF-S 18-55mm IS lens. any comment? thanx!
hi! im still confused which of the two dslr camera i am going to buy. nikon d5000 or canon 500d? i read a lot of reviews but still i cannot decide. this will be my first dslr camera. pls help me. any suggestion? which is better between the two? my friend told me that if i will choose canon 500d i must buy EF-S 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6 rather than EF-S 18-55mm IS lens. any comment or suggestion? thank you!
Hi loren,
clearly as this comment thread show, this is a really tough decision. To repeat, it’s important to understand how you will likely use the camera, what lens length you like etc. I personally have a preference for the 500D’s LCD, but I like having a high res display for checking focus, etc. Others will love the D5000’s flip down display (I liked it too). neither handles live view well, so the flip down display doesn’t really help there, but it does help with video and tripod work. Between the two, the D5000 feel better in the hands. Image quality is roughly the same. I’d think about the lenses you might want in the future, look at their prices, and then put it all together and make a decision. Either will make you pretty happy.
thanx patrick! this page helps me a lot. i think i will purchase canon 500d.
Hi,
Tossing up between the Canon 500D and the Nikon D5000.
I want to shoot video on my camera and this will be used mostly (and please don’t want a seperate video camera). Want the convenience of a camera that can do both.
Photographs I understand are crisper on the nikon.
Really need some help as all reviews not that committed to either. Don’t care about lense compatability.
So for video shooting which camera D5000 or 500D ?
Hi, I am just like the rest,First time getting a DSLR camera and don’t know 500D or D5000 to go for?
1.D5000 have to ability to take picture from different angle due to the LCD?
2.But i have a question? In a long run, will the LCD loose up due to the often turning, and moving?
3.Is canon lense overall cheaper then Nikon lense?
4. Canon is made from Japan but Nikon is made from thailand.
Does that made any different?
Both of this camera spec are almost the same.
Please help me? need help?
Orange,
it didn’t seem like the LCD would get much looser, but I can’t say for sure. In a very general sense Canon lenses tend to be cheaper in price than the nikons, but no, the location of where they are made (China vs thailand) shouldn’t be used as an indicator to the build quality. Have you handled both cameras? I think the Nikon fits in the hands better than the 500D does and the lcd does help you get interesting compositions, and certainly helps some with video. It’s a tough choice, I know, but as I keep saying—ask yourself how you’ll really use the camera, and what type of lens you may want to add (and check those prices), then think about what system you see yourself going with in the future, would you like to upgrade to a D300s or D700 one day or something like a EOS 7D or 5D Mark II, etc. Between D5000 and 500D, your prints will basically look the same, so you kind of have to think about your future a little bit.
hello,
went to the camera shop today and had both nikon d5000 and canon 500d in my hands.. in early 90’s i used nikon n8008’s and i have stopped using slr camera since 2002. Now I have this urge to pursue photography as a side hobby of mine..
Eventhough I kept telling myself to get a Nikon for my first dslr… however i felt I prefer canon 500d design.
May I ask why nikon d90 is much superior to canon 500d?? do u think i should be checking out the d90 before buying canon 500d??
Aris,
I think the D90 fits in the hands better, it has a better build quality, and gives you the handy additional top side LCD. Overall it’s undeniably a better camera, but again, on a print level won’t be a big difference (same as the D5000 actually).
Ok I may be a little late to the discussion but maybe someone can help. I’ve narrowed it down to these 2 slrs for me and my wifes entry into the dslr world. Based on our needs both cameras seem more than adequate in terms of resolution, IQ, ISO handling and very basic/minimum video recording. My question is which handles macro applications (esp nature like flowers and bugs) better and has better macroing lenses? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Jarad, for one thing in live view the D5000 doesn’t give the greatest magnified view, and the LCD is lower res than the Canon. Assuming you’ll do macro on a tripod and use Live View ( I would) that could be a big deal. Both have nice lenses–nikon even has a new DX 85mm macro offering, but I’d give an edge to the 500D for the monitor.
Patrick, thanks for the info! But, thats strictly for our viewing purposes right? The LCD doesn’t actually affect the IQ or focusing right? Or are you saying that the LCD is so bad/unclear that we would not be able to focus as well with the D5000 and therefore it actually would affect our macro shots negatively?… lol hopefully that makes sense
It just makes acquiring absolute focus easier. When zoomed in on the D5000 (and D90) the detail looks fuzzy, so you have to kind of guess a bit with your focus. (I’m talking about while in Live View). The 500D has a better zoomed in view AND the screen has better resolution, so you can really see your focus while zoomed in. If you don’t think you’ll use live view for this type of work it won’t matter, and anyway doesn’t effect image quality. I’m just thinking if I did macro, I’d probably use a tripod and I’d probably use live view to compose my images, and in that case the 500D has an edge. Just something to consider.
Patrick, I’d like to ask your opinion, which of these two has:
1) the most “stout” construction and could stand up to rigorous use – if neither, which one of the two is better than the other. And,
2) which is better for use in in rainy/moist conditions.
Thanks very much for that, I really appreciate your advice.
I’d be happy to hear from others who have actually used these particular models in specific situations rather than hearing about brand reputation and affinity rants & raves.
P. Scott,
I’d say both have the same quality, I don’t know the Nikon looks a little better to me, but I wouldn’t take either in the rain as they both lack sealing. Probably not the answer you’re looking for, but that’s my take. I did use both in misty conditions, like around big waterfalls with no problem, but if water got into the seams, you’d have issues.
Thanks very much for that – its what I needed to hear…
P. Scott,
you’re welcome, let us know what you end up getting!
Aww..im not getting a Nikon D5000 this time. has the issue been resolved in the D5000?i read reviews that it just dies down?LOL..
im going to get the Canon eos 500d.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Nikon+-+12.3-Megapixel+Digital+SLR+Camera+-+Black/9311755.p?id=1218082646627&skuId=9311755
is it okay to share links?but if not.Delete it..
Thanks
Chard.
Hello.
Wife wants a camera that could zoom in to our kids when they are in stage, has live view just in case she needs to hold the camera over her head when someone is blocking her view. Also for kids playing soccer, etc. Which one of the two would be better? Thank you.
For holding overhead the D5000 would be a smarter choice, but both are equally as capable in the other scenarios. One of the issues will be lens selection. For sports and the stage you’ll need reach, and the kit lenses tend to be slow (small aperture) when zoomed out, which means you’ll have to compensate with higher ISO. Just something to think about.
Hello! I have spent hours researching on what Digital SLR Camera to get. I’m new to the DSLR world so not everything is clear as day. I do know I want a Nikon or Canon, and I know you probably already see the question coming!
I was really into the Nikon D5000 and after seeing it and getting a feel for it at the store I had my heart set on it. But then I thought I should research Canon more and make sure it’s right. Well now I’m stuck. I can’t decide which I want even after reading several reviews (like this one) and looking at different sites comparing the two.
The price ($800ish) is about what I can pay. What I love to photograph is close-up (like bugs and flowers), action (sports just for fun), pets and indoor. How do I choose?
Thank you!
Boz, for close up the Canon would be better, especially if you use live view or a tripod, because the LCD is so much better, and the Canon has superior zooming in on the Live View. To me that’s the biggest thing the LCD differences. I like the D5000’s rotating LCD which is has its uses, and I like the high res LCD on the Canon for macro work and such. Otherwise they’re equally capable.
Having finally used both cameras for a solid day I think I’m in a better position to comment now.
The Nikon feels better to hold and use in general. No doubt.
The Canon seems slightly more plasticky and less robust (only time will tell) Canon lenses generally give a slight edge in IQ like for like and if your using the camera for macro or night work forget the Nikon.
I personally wouldn’t buy either camera as there a bit too slow and flimsy. Save another £100 quid and buy something real nice.
I wish people would stop banging on about the D90 as if it’s a viable alternative to the 500d. It’s not, it’s about £300 more so lets get real. Plenty of mention on this page of D90s and D300s yet strangely very little mention of Canons D40/50 or D5. lets get this into perspective. If you have a grand what are you doing looking here ?
As Patrick has said there are some nice cameras other than canon/nikon (though I personally would make sure they offer what you want as a system.)
Must admit I like the compactness of the new Lumix G1 but have yet to try and there apears to be a limited amount of glass available (that I can afford anyway)
Best advice as allways is not to take too much notice of what anyone says and go try what you think you will like yourself.
James,
you’re findings match mine. I prefer the D5000 in the hands, but would probably pick the 500D if I had to choose one. On the D90, I’ve suggested myself that folks do their best to move up to one if they can. At times the price here can be quite close. But it always pays to find something you want, then buy up one, if you can. 40D, 50D, D90 all much superior to the other 2 cameras, though on paper you probably won’t see it. But as you said, it really helps to get your hands on both of these 2, and see which you prefer in the hands/LCD, etc, because the pics are going to be about the same.
hi! i would like to ask which is better canon EF-S 18-200mm lense or sigma 18-200mm lense? im using a canon rebel t1i/500d.
The Canon, Absolutely without question. A good walkaround lens and much better build and IQ than the sigma. As allways just try the 2 of them for 2 minutes and that should convince you. There’s nothing wrong with the Sigma it’s just not as good as the Canon.
Im a bit confused now on which one to choose. With all these tug-of-war. But anyways, here are my uses when I get one:
1) Nature Photos
2) Sports Photos (Occasionally)
3) Concerts
4) Events (Wedding, Birthdays, etc)
5) Family
6) Macro Shots
My question is which one is perfect for me. I am a pure beginner. My Brother uses a Canon Mark something.. which costs like a fortune.. And another thing which one has better lenses for the styles of photographs that I’m going to do. Please help.. Everytime I talk to my brother or other photographers they all tell me its personal preferences. Any Tips? Thanks
Patrick.
Going completely off subject for a minute.
Which of the four thirds cameras have you tried and like. To be honest I’m tired of hauling 5 kilos of gear around with me every time I go out.
Was looking at the lumix G1/GF1 (the gf1 looks the most compact.
Or are the Olympus the better bet ? Ruled out the GH1 due to the fact I don’t want /need video and it’s quite pricy.
Any ideas ?
Wow thanks for the review.
Hopefully next month, i have enough money for D5000
Bads,
Put that Christmas bonus to work if you’re lucky enough to get one!
Wow… first of I must thanks Patrick, for writing such a good review, and off course, the total community who shared their subjective, objective as well as evaluative comments.
Before reading this entry (just a week ago) I was in so much dilemma of getting a one between D5000 and 500D. But I think now the dust is settled. I would go by my gut feeling and purchase the one which I liked at first sight(in DSLR) i.e Canon 500D. My reasons are – Better live view when compared to D5000, Good options of lens when compared with quality & pricing, Great depth of field control even in video mode as well AF(for beginners), 3″ 920K dots screen, and to some extent better HD video recording compared to D5000.
Actually it is so amusing to see how my decisions kept on changing. Having no previous camera (not even P&S) I always had great liking for photography. With the basic bookish knowledge I’d regarding camera and way of photography, at first I was so inclined to SONY Cyber shot H-20 B. For about a month I was checking its prices, youtube videos and related information. Sooner I thought of increasing my budget and get a semi-pro P&S which limited my choices to Canon SX1, Sony HX1, Olympus SP – 590 (super-zoom P&S). I would had almost bought Sony HX1 from Dell, if they had not increased the price to $499 from $419 on the day I decided to buy it. Sony’s Sweep Panorama, Burst of 10fps at full resolution, “almost” 1080p (1440*1080 @ 30fps) video recording and hand held Twilight features kept me drooling over it till the last week of November 2009.
But lately I figured out that I’m so interested in photography that I might wanna pursue the hobby towards professional level. At this moment I changed my plan towards DSLR and had a thorough reviews of D3000, EOS 400D, EOS 450D as well as Sony’s A330.
Then I stumbled on this video review from cameralabs of 500D which almost aroused the feelings of “love at first sight” Checking for more reviews, it got confusing which to buy between D5000 & 500D. Digging more into this, after reading more professional review and seeing the trends of professional photographers I realized, lens play an utmost importance when you take the level towards professionalism. And this I would say was the biggest reason why I’m tending towards 500D, which would even satisfy my need of having (at least respectable quality) of HD camera. And yes though I might not be right to judge, but I’d seen some great video shoots at vimeo which were done by 500D, off course post processing was also involved but the videos were simply great if not best.
I lay my words…with my thanks to all.
Yogesh,
I think you’ve made a good decision, and certainly an informed one. All of your points are dead-on for me, the LCD, and lens selection/prices give the 500D an edge for me too (if I had to choose between the two). Your comment is a good example for others in the same boat. It’s important to know where you might go with your photography, and then what lenses might be needed to accomplish that. Check out those lenses and the prices–then decide on the camera.
hey patrick .. just want to ask if d5000 is a better cam for a newbie like me ? because everybody tells me that 500d is for professionals already .. what do you think ? i strongly need your reply .. thanks ..
I have to say… The interface and the guide system provided in D5000 is much more easy to understand when compared to 500D.
But I’ll tell you what, none of these cameras would be classified for professional or entry level. According to me (subjective) they stand in between the. In fact I should say, they “bridge” the entry level & professional level camera. Put some high quality glasses in either of them and you are good to snatch pictures which may make up your living.
So broadly classify the pros & cons of each of them and then select. They both are winners in my view.
See my earlier comment it may helps you.
newbie,
I think the D5000 is EXCELLENT for beginners, so is the D3000, which will really hold your hand, but no live view.
patrick pretends to be unbiased but i see what you’re ultimately trying to push on the people dude. you’re a canon sympathizer hands down. i went to sams club and had both dslr cameras in my hand. i prefer how the d5000 feels and i am in love with the screen. all this talk about resolution i see the stuff on live view just fine. also if you guys are worried about the shots it takes, just google photos taken with nikon d5000 they’re great!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m not taking side of Patrick.. nor I’m here to critique you. In fact what you have done is good by going to the shop and picking up the camera which made you feel better. We all are different for one or more reasons and hence liking differs. Patrick has been saying both are excellent cameras throughout this post except for the concluding part where has stated “subjective’ choice and that is fair enough.
In fact I went ahead and placed my order for EOS D500 today. As I earlier said, both cameras are winners in my perspective and each one who buys either have the cameras have a perfect reason to buy them.
Yogesh,
It really is a coin toss between the 2, pick them up, see what fits better, buy it. I’d probably get the 500D for myself personally, but many folks would be better off with the D5000. Sometimes the choice between 2 cameras is easier, but here with these two, not so much.
Thanks Patrick,
I picked up EOS 500D with lot much of study and reviews. I’m fully aware of its CONS & PROS.. Although it is my first Camera that too DSLR, I had a good enough knowledge of photography. I’m awaiting by camera, which will be delivered within next 3 to 5 days.
Also I’m currently looking at a cheap High Aperture (small F number) lenses which will allow me to capture good shallow depth of field images. Propably I’ll end up getting Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 which is around $100 bill.
/— Off Topic —/
If you could add a css “justify” to your comments stylesheet, it will be better. Because as your replies to same comment goes on increasing, the comment area does on decreasing and it somehow looks un professional
Sounds good, congrats on your purchase, and hopefully it all works out well for you. Be sure to stop back and post a link to your pics after you’ve spent some time with the new camera.
On the CSS, normally there aren’t so many replies so this isn’t an issue. We just have a couple of posts here where the comments turn into a forum almost, which is great, but obviously goes beyond the amount of replies that the CSS had planned for.
dante,
I actually really like the D5000, I really do, it might even be capable of slightly better images than the T1i, and be more fun to use. BUT…the printed results will be the same, and I like the T1i’s LCD. I agree with nearly everything you say, it’s a great camera, feels great, works great, takes great pictures. I personally don’t think you can see zoomed in as well on the D5000 (in live view) so for macro the T1i has a slight edge, and some of Canon’s lenses are cheaper—a big factor for folks on a budget. That’s all I’m saying.