Comments on: Nikon D3x Officially Announced: 24.5 Megapixels, $8000 http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d3x-officially-announced-245-megapixels-8000/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:07:15 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Patrick http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d3x-officially-announced-245-megapixels-8000/comment-page-1/#comment-1334 Patrick Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:03:36 +0000 http://www.neutralday.com/?p=2499#comment-1334 david, Given the probable use, ISO 1600 won't be a factor. A typical studio shoot would be well lit. Even a landscape photographer would probably not be frequenting ISO 1600 too often. So I think that's a moot point, (I think). $8000 though, For the pro, that won't be an issue. For the hobbyist....Well everything else looks like a real value. david,
Given the probable use, ISO 1600 won’t be a factor. A typical studio shoot would be well lit. Even a landscape photographer would probably not be frequenting ISO 1600 too often. So I think that’s a moot point, (I think).

$8000 though, For the pro, that won’t be an issue. For the hobbyist….Well everything else looks like a real value.

]]> By: david http://www.neutralday.com/nikon-d3x-officially-announced-245-megapixels-8000/comment-page-1/#comment-1333 david Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:49:37 +0000 http://www.neutralday.com/?p=2499#comment-1333 wow in my personal opinion I don't think nikon could have possibly made a worse decision in releasing the D3x... basically a worse camera feature wise in most every way than the d3 and d700, except its 24 mp sensor and 16 bit... i mean iso 1600??? come on nikon... id go d3 over this in a second wow in my personal opinion I don’t think nikon could have possibly made a worse decision in releasing the D3x… basically a worse camera feature wise in most every way than the d3 and d700, except its 24 mp sensor and 16 bit… i mean iso 1600??? come on nikon… id go d3 over this in a second

]]>