Nikon Coolpix S630 Digital Compact Camera Review at DPInterface

DPInterface reviews the Nikon Coolpix S630, a 12 megapixel digital compact camera with a 7x zoom lens and 2.7 inch LCD display:

The only good things about the Nikon Coolpix S630 were low distortion and no redeye, but in all other respects, the camera produced below average image quality. It’s such a pity, considering the camera has a decent feature set, the S630 is let down by its image quality.

-DPInterface

Yep. I was kind of thinking one of the qualities I like in a camera the most is the “image” quality. That’s too bad.

Another thought: Why can’t Nikon get its act together on the compact side of things…just strange.

Continue the Discussion

Join us on Facebook! Become a fan of Neutralday today! Become a fan of Neutralday on Facebook. Interact with us and stay updated on what's coming next at Neutralday, photography news, and other fans' insights. Follow us on Twitter! Grab our tweets right here. Follow Neutralday on Twitter. Insights on the cameras we're reviewing, and frequent photography related news, thoughts, and links. Support Neutralday by shopping at our preferred retailer, B&H Photo

Explore Similar Posts

• Nikon Announces Two New S-series Coolpix Cameras: S11…
• Nikon Coolpix P100 In Depth Review
• Nikon Issues Firmware Updates for Coolpix S3000 and S…
• Now Posted: Our In Depth Review of the Nikon Coolpix …
• Version 1.1 Firmware Update Available for Nikon Coolp…

1. 

   Eolake Stobblehouse says:

   March 27, 2009 at 5:15 pm

   Yes, it really is strange. Two years ago or so, I bought the Nikon P-4 I think it was called, it was one of the very first compacts with image stabilization. And the image quality just sucked! So strange. Canon’s compacts on the other hand, even the smallest ones, have *awesome* image quality.

   reply
2. 

   Patrick says:

   March 27, 2009 at 5:45 pm

   Over an entire range of compacts Nikon isn’t leading the rest in a single camera, instead it’s constantly Canon/Panasonic. I just don’t get that.

   reply