<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon PowerShot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:01:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>Got this from DP Review website (dpreview.com)

Continuous shooting

• Full-Resolution Image
2.3 frames/sec  Max. 5 images (Standard mode), Max 3 images (Fine Mode)
• High-speed Burst Mode:
Approx. 10 frames/sec (recorded in 3M for 4:3, 2.5M for 3:2,
2M for 16:9)(Speed Priority)
Approx. 6 frames/sec (recorded in 3M for 4:3, 2.5M for 3:2,2M for 16:9)(Image Priority)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this from DP Review website (dpreview.com)</p>
<p>Continuous shooting</p>
<p>• Full-Resolution Image<br />
2.3 frames/sec  Max. 5 images (Standard mode), Max 3 images (Fine Mode)<br />
• High-speed Burst Mode:<br />
Approx. 10 frames/sec (recorded in 3M for 4:3, 2.5M for 3:2,<br />
2M for 16:9)(Speed Priority)<br />
Approx. 6 frames/sec (recorded in 3M for 4:3, 2.5M for 3:2,2M for 16:9)(Image Priority)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Cameras &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Olympus E-P2 vs. Panasonic GF1 Part One: ISO and IQ Comparisons</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-6873</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Cameras &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Olympus E-P2 vs. Panasonic GF1 Part One: ISO and IQ Comparisons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-6873</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon PowerShot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon PowerShot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-6481</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-6481</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking maybe, I can&#039;t say for sure though. Some cameras do allow for higher ISO via lower resolution, but I&#039;ve never really liked those results either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking maybe, I can&#8217;t say for sure though. Some cameras do allow for higher ISO via lower resolution, but I&#8217;ve never really liked those results either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-6477</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-6477</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read reviews of the SX20 IS that talk about the image quality and camera noise at 400 ISO or higher being an issue compared to the SX10 which apparently doesn&#039;t have that problem at 400 ISO.  If the MP on the SX20 are set manually to 10 will the image quality improve at 400 ISO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read reviews of the SX20 IS that talk about the image quality and camera noise at 400 ISO or higher being an issue compared to the SX10 which apparently doesn&#8217;t have that problem at 400 ISO.  If the MP on the SX20 are set manually to 10 will the image quality improve at 400 ISO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-6344</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-6344</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ron..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ron..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-6337</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-6337</guid>
		<description>SPECS ERROR: CANON SX20 - The camera DOES NOT have a Superfine JPG mode.  Only the SX1 and SX10 have that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPECS ERROR: CANON SX20 &#8211; The camera DOES NOT have a Superfine JPG mode.  Only the SX1 and SX10 have that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-6235</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-6235</guid>
		<description>Here is a major factor that was left out: (Otherwise perfect review!)

Continuous Drive
SX20 IS: 0.7 fps	
FZ35:    2.3 fps, for 5 images

Will the SX20 continually shoot 0.7fps and be able to sustain this possibly forever?? (How many shots could we get with a really good SD card?)

The 2.3 fps on the FZ35 sounds awesome, but does it have the ability to shoot 1 fps so I can shoot a 20s sequence? (Is there a setting I could adjust so when I hold down shoot it only does 1fps instead of 2.3fps at full quality, or do I have to train my finger to push every second?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a major factor that was left out: (Otherwise perfect review!)</p>
<p>Continuous Drive<br />
SX20 IS: 0.7 fps<br />
FZ35:    2.3 fps, for 5 images</p>
<p>Will the SX20 continually shoot 0.7fps and be able to sustain this possibly forever?? (How many shots could we get with a really good SD card?)</p>
<p>The 2.3 fps on the FZ35 sounds awesome, but does it have the ability to shoot 1 fps so I can shoot a 20s sequence? (Is there a setting I could adjust so when I hold down shoot it only does 1fps instead of 2.3fps at full quality, or do I have to train my finger to push every second?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ada</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-6230</link>
		<dc:creator>ada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-6230</guid>
		<description>Canon is panasonic company, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon is panasonic company, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-5947</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-5947</guid>
		<description>when will you be issuing the comparison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will you be issuing the comparison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.neutralday.com/canon-powershot-sx20-is-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz35/comment-page-1/#comment-5866</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neutralday.com/?p=7472#comment-5866</guid>
		<description>iwan,
Likely you&#039;ll be happy with either. Honestly these two are so close, that it could really come down to which one looks better to you. I like the FZ35, but image quality between the two are quite close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iwan,<br />
Likely you&#8217;ll be happy with either. Honestly these two are so close, that it could really come down to which one looks better to you. I like the FZ35, but image quality between the two are quite close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
