Nikon D3s on October 14th? 5 Unconventional but Compelling Compact Cameras

Canon PowerShot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

15 comments
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

If you’re in the market for a new superzoom camera, then we’re quite sure that 2 models are on the top of your list, the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. Like their respective predecessors, the SX10 IS and the FZ28, these two cameras are spec’d very closely to each other, even closer in this generation, and it makes deciding between the two incredibly difficult. For starters both cameras feature a 12.1 megapixel sensor with image stabilized zoom lenses. Both shoot 720p high definition video with stereo sound, have dedicated record buttons, and feature HDMI connections. Finally, both cameras retail for the same price, $399, which makes choosing even more difficult. There are however some key differences, and any one of them may be enough to tip you one way or the other. I’ve compiled some of the key features and differences of the two camera, as well as a specifications comparison, so you can see just how close these two superzooms are. I’m hoping I’ll be able to fit in reviews of both of these cameras soon, in the meantime I hope this post can serve as a conversation starter, if you’ve got an opinion on one of these cameras or have a review you’d like to share, please leave it in the comments below.

Where to Buy

Both of these cameras are in stock now at B&H Photo Video. Check the links to get the best price, as both are currently “too low to list”.

bh_camerasadCanon Powershot SX20 IS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
SanDisk 4GB SDHC Card $11.95
SanDisk Ultra SDHC Memory Card (4GB) $19.95
SanDisk 4GB Extreme III SDHC Card $34.95

A Closer Look

Canon Powershot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

The Canon Powershot SX20 IS noticeably taller than the Panasonic FZ35, and with batteries installed, also significantly heavier.

Canon Powershot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

The FZ35 has a slightly larger LCD, but the SX20 IS has the flip out LCD, which can be a real convenience for shooting video and stills for that matter. Notice both cameras make it easy to record video with dedicated (red) record buttons.

Canon Powershot SX20 IS vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

This shot shows the FZ35 is wider than the SX20 IS when both lenses are retracted. Also the SX20 IS has a hot shoe for external flash attachment.

Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

digic 4lcd
DIGIC 4 powers processing for still images and video.The key advantage, I think, a flip out and rotating LCD.
hotshoelens
Dedicated hot shoe for external Speedlite flashImpressive 20x zoom lens, 28-560mm equivalent.

Let’s start with the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS. It notably improves on the SX10 IS by bumping up the resolution to 12.1 megapixels from 10, and better, adds high definition video recording at 720p with HDMI out. These 2 key stats put the SX20 IS largely in line with the FZ35, but there are a couple of distinct differences. First, the SX20 IS is simply a larger, heavier camera. Throw in a slightly bigger grip and the SX20 IS overall feels beefier than the FZ35, though both cameras have roughly the same overall build quality (as in mostly plastic, but well constructed). The biggest difference I see between the two cameras centers around the flip out and rotating LCD of the SX20 IS. At 2.5 inches, it does come in a little bit smaller than the Panasonic FZ35’s 2.7 inch offering, but given they have the same 230k resolution, having an articulating LCD is a big plus. After reviewing the Olympus E-620 and the Nikon D5000, I’ve grown quite partial to these versatile displays, they make compositions more fun and certainly can have a more natural feel when shooting movies. The next key advantage for the SX20 IS is the included hot shoe, which allows for the SX20 to use an external flash if desired, a boon for getting improved results with flash lighting and adding to the “system” feel of the SX20 IS. Next, the SX20 offers a 20x zoom compared to theFZ35’s 18x zoom. This works out to 560mm of telescopic length on the SX20 IS versus 486mm on the FZ35. In the real world this isn’t a huge difference, but once again the SX20 IS has an advantage here. Finally, there is the questionable advantage of the SX20’s ability to use 4 AA batteries, which I’ll admit I’m not fond of, but it does allow for the convenience of being able to get batteries anywhere if the power runs out while traveling for example. I may be biased, but I personally prefer the convenience of recharging a lithium ion battery.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

img01img02
The FZ35 features a Leica 18x zoom lens with a notable f/4.4 on the long end.That little joystick is used to make adjustments to camera settings.
img03img04
Nice and easy record movies button.The FZ35 has a bigger 2.7 inch LCD than the SX20 IS, but doesn't flip out and rotate.

The FZ35 features less noticeable improvements from its predecessor, the FZ28, but likely the most noticed one is the improvement in resolution to 12.1 megapixels. We’ve gone over some of the advantages of the SX20 IS, but the FZ35 has its own key differences, which I think may be preferred by some photographers. Let’s start with RAW. The FZ35 has the capability to shoot RAW files in addition to JPEG which allows for better editing options after capture. While unlikely to bring big improvements to noise and sharpness attributes, simple corrections like white balance and exposure are always better made with RAW files. In video mode the FZ35 offers the choice of recording to the more compact AVCHD file format or to the easier to edit later MPEG format. We’ve gone over the battery issue above, but I personally prefer the FZ35’s rechargable lithium ion battery over the SX20 IS’ AA batteries, though this is clearly a matter up for debate. On the lens side of things, we’ve already note the SX20 has the reach advantage, but the FZ35 has its own plus here, namely a faster/brighter aperture at the longest end, f/4.4 for the FZ35 vs. f/5.7 on the SX20. Finally the FZ35 checks in smaller than its competitor and lighter as well. Whether this is an advantage or not will depend entirely on your own personal preferences.

Conclusion

As you can see, there’s more similarities between these two assured best sellers than differences. Both offer the same resolution, use electronic viewfinders, have easy to implement HD movie recording, feature robust intelligent Auto modes in addition to manual modes, and provide incredibly long reach in relatively small sizes. The differences are few, but may end up being distinct enough for some consumers. Clearly the SX20’s articulating LCD is a huge difference for those so inclined (including me), and there is the advantage of using external flash, and the slight reach advantage of the 20x zoom. For the FZ35, the RAW files may be a real advantage for some, the smaller stature will appeal to others, and not having to use 4 AA batteries will be a plus for others. I also tend to like the more serious look of the FZ35 over the more rounded SX20, but that’s just me. In the end, the heft and grip of the SX20, along with the flip out LCD would probably win me over, but I’ll reserve judgment till I get some further extended hands on time.

Specifications

CameraCanon PowerShot SX20 ISPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Price (Street)$399$399
Max resolution4000 x 30004000 x 3000
Low resolution3840 x 2160, 3264 x 2448, 2592 x 1944, 1600 x 1200, 640 x 480, 320 x 2404000 x 2672, 4000 x 2248, 3264 x 2448, 3264 x 2176, 3264 x 1840, 2560 x 1920, 2560 x 1712, 2560 x 1440, 2048 x 1536, 2048 x 1360, 1920 x 1080, 1600 x 1200, 640 x 480
Image ratio w:h4:3, 16:916:9, 4:3, 3:2
Effective pixels12.1 million12.1 million
Sensor size1/2.3 " (6.16 x 4.62 mm, 0.28 cm_)1/2.33 " (6.13 x 4.60 mm, 0.28 cm_)
Sensor typeCCDCCD
ISO ratingAuto, 80 ,100, 200, 400, 800, 1600Auto, Hi Auto (1600-6400), 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600
Zoom wide (W)28 mm27 mm
Zoom tele (T)560 mm (20 x)486 mm (18 x)
Digital zoomYes, 4xYes, 4x
Image stabilizationYes, LensYes, Lens
Aperture rangeF2.8 - F5.7F2.8 - F4.4
Min shutter15 sec60 sec
Max shutter1/3200 sec1/2000 sec
Built-in FlashYes, pop-upYes, pop-up
Flash range6.8 m8.5 m
External flashYes: hot-shoeNo
Exposure compensation-2 to +2 EV in 1/3 EV steps-2 to +2 EV in 0.3 EV steps
MeteringEvaluative, Center Weighted, SpotIntelligent Multiple, Center-weighted, Spot
Aperture priorityYesYes
Shutter priorityYesYes
Continuous DriveYes: 0.7 fpsYes: 2.3 fps, for 5 images
Movie ClipsYes: 1280 x 720 @ 30fps, 640 x 480, @ 30 fps, 320 x 240 @ 60 / 30 fpsYes: 1280 x 720, 30 fps, 848 x 480, 30 fps, 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 30 fps
Self-timerYes: 2 or 10 sec or customYes: 2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)
Storage typesSD / SDHC / MMC / MMC Plus / HC MMC PlusSD/SDHC card, Internal
Uncompressed formatNoYes: RAW
Quality LevelsSuper-Fine, Fine, NormalFine, Standard
ViewfinderElectronicElectronic
LCD2.5 "2.7 "
LCD Dots230,000230,000
HDMIYesYes
BatteryAA batteries (NiMH recommended)Lithium-Ion rechargeble
Weight (inc. batteries)600 g (21.2 oz)397 g (14 oz)
Dimensions128 x 88 x 87 mm (5 x 3.5 x 3.4 in)118 x 76 x 89 mm (4.6 x 3 x 3.5 in)

Availabiltiy

Support our site and get the best deals and service by shopping at B&H Photo Video.

bh_camerasadCanon Powershot SX20 IS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
SanDisk 4GB SDHC Card $11.95
SanDisk Ultra SDHC Memory Card (4GB) $19.95
SanDisk 4GB Extreme III SDHC Card $34.95

Both cameras are in stock now at Amazon.

Similar Posts:


  1. I don’t pretend to be an expert photographer nor do I consider myself a novas, I’ve owned a 4 Canons A1, AE1, S1 IS and SX10 IS. Prior to my owning a SX10 IS, I was a diehard Canon supporter but after my S1 IS bit the proverbial dust, it had a bad sensor that resulted in canon upgrading me to the SX10, to which I initially thought Woo Who until the continued dismal performance of the SX10 in low light conditions. I have to give BIG kudos to Canon support for working with me sadly to no avail on resolving my problem. After the 2nd SX10 (Canon replaced the 1st one, believed to be faulty) which continued providing the same dismal performance as the 1st one, I had had enough of missing out on photo ops of my two girls; especially after I was taking pictures at my daughter’s college indoctrination ceremony and a lady taking pictures with an iPhone photos came out better than mine taken with my SX10. :-( … So, after some extensive research, I chose the FZ35 which arrived via 2 day delivery from Amazon and man I have to tell ya even though I’ve had it less than a week now, “Out of the Box” it performed as expected, as a high end “Point-and-shoot” camera when shooting in doors. The consistency with which the FZ35 takes quality photos, with minimal to “NO” mucking around with setting has made me a believer in the Panasonic Lumix FZ35; as a true high end “point-n-shoot camera out of the box” !!!
    BTW, the SX10 took some awesome pictures when I was outside shooting (plenty of light) my daughter track and field events but alas, overall owning the SX10 proved to be both a frustrating and very disappointing ordeal; especially in light of the stellar performance I had received owing my 3 previous Canons A1, AE1 & especially S1IS.

    Also, check out this review of the FZ35:

    Video Review of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpxHpj4ww1A

    Hope this helps.

    • TxShooter,
      I’ve said it before but nothing beats satisfied customers…glad to hear the FZ35 is working out for ya (and thanks for the mini review.)

  2. The lack of hot shoe on the Panasonic can be pretty well compensated with a slave flash. Therefore the articulated LCD is the primary advantage of the Canon. Left out of this discussion is the threaded lens barrel which allows the Panasonic the use of lens filters and even wide angle and telephoto attachments as well as the always useful ‘UV filter’ which can be used as a lens protector. That feature was the determining factor for me as I like the protective feature of using a UV filter and also like to make occasional use of a polarizing filter. Otherwise, I’d likely opted for the Canon simply because of it’s articulated LCD. You likely couldn’t go wrong with either camera.

    • totally agree…either camera would be great, (though I prefer the Panasonic’s look more) By the way folks, we’ll be getting one to review this week…Any questions?

  3. Confuse….
    Buy canon or panasonic…
    canon zomm 20x but panasonic 18x, best capture?
    i’m not a professional, but i like fotografi..

    • iwan,
      Likely you’ll be happy with either. Honestly these two are so close, that it could really come down to which one looks better to you. I like the FZ35, but image quality between the two are quite close.

  4. when will you be issuing the comparison?

  5. Canon is panasonic company, no?

  6. Here is a major factor that was left out: (Otherwise perfect review!)

    Continuous Drive
    SX20 IS: 0.7 fps
    FZ35: 2.3 fps, for 5 images

    Will the SX20 continually shoot 0.7fps and be able to sustain this possibly forever?? (How many shots could we get with a really good SD card?)

    The 2.3 fps on the FZ35 sounds awesome, but does it have the ability to shoot 1 fps so I can shoot a 20s sequence? (Is there a setting I could adjust so when I hold down shoot it only does 1fps instead of 2.3fps at full quality, or do I have to train my finger to push every second?)

    • Got this from DP Review website (dpreview.com)

      Continuous shooting

      • Full-Resolution Image
      2.3 frames/sec Max. 5 images (Standard mode), Max 3 images (Fine Mode)
      • High-speed Burst Mode:
      Approx. 10 frames/sec (recorded in 3M for 4:3, 2.5M for 3:2,
      2M for 16:9)(Speed Priority)
      Approx. 6 frames/sec (recorded in 3M for 4:3, 2.5M for 3:2,2M for 16:9)(Image Priority)

  7. SPECS ERROR: CANON SX20 – The camera DOES NOT have a Superfine JPG mode. Only the SX1 and SX10 have that.

  8. I’ve read reviews of the SX20 IS that talk about the image quality and camera noise at 400 ISO or higher being an issue compared to the SX10 which apparently doesn’t have that problem at 400 ISO. If the MP on the SX20 are set manually to 10 will the image quality improve at 400 ISO?

    • I’m thinking maybe, I can’t say for sure though. Some cameras do allow for higher ISO via lower resolution, but I’ve never really liked those results either.

Leave a Reply