Great Holiday Prices on Nikon, Canon, Pentax, and Sony Digital SLR Cameras DxO Optics Pro Version 6.1 for Windows Now Supports Canon 7D, G11 and Nikon D3000

Canon PowerShot S90 In Depth Digital Camera Review

10 comments
Canon PowerShot S90 In Depth Digital Camera Review

Canon PowerShot S90 Digital Camera Review

643178The Canon PowerShot S90 is the latest iteration in Canon’s well regarded S series that aims to lure photographers in with its carry everywhere compact size and enthusiast oriented feature set. Offering full manual shooting options, RAW+JPEG shooting, an f/2 wide angle lens, and low-noise oriented 10 megapixel sensor, the S90 is a low compromise solution for photographers looking for an everyday point and shoot camera, while offering very good image quality, all packaged in a slick and compact form factor. To find out if the S90 will meet your enthusiast needs, please continue reading our Canon PowerShot S90 digital camera review.

Availability

The Canon PowerShot S90 is available and in stock now at B&H Photo. You can get great prices, service, and selection and support this site at the same time by shopping at B&H Photo through the links below. Thanks for your continuing support!

643178-1

Canon PowerShot S90 Digital Camera

Price: $ 399.95 at B&H Photo

Competitors

There are several indirect and potential competitors, but the most obvious alternative to the S90 has to be the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3. Both are spec’d very closely with 10 megapixel sensors, similar ISO ranges, RAW shooting options, and similar LCD displays. Notable differences include the LX3’s ability to shoot 720p video and the S90’s longer lens reach (105mm vs. 60mm). I’ve compiled a table to compare some of the two cameras key specifications.

front-comparison

CameraCanon PowerShot S90Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
Price (street estimate U.S.)$429$499
Sensor Resolution10.0 million10.1 million
Sensor Size/Type1/1.7 " CCD1/1.63 " CCD
ISO Range80-320080-3200
Lens28-105mm, f/2-f/4.924-60mm, f/2-f/2.8
LCD3 inch, 461k3 inch, 460k
Built in flashYesYes
Continuous Shooting.9 fps2.5 fps (for 8 images)
RAW ShootingYesYes
Movie Clips (best)640 x 480 @ 30 fps1280 x 720 @ 24 fps
Weight195 g (6.9 oz)265 g (9.3 oz)
Dimensions100 x 58 x 31 mm (3.9 x 2.3 x 1.2 in)109 x 60 x 27 mm (4.3 x 2.4 x 1.1 in)

Highlights

A quick look at some of the S90’s feature highlights.

canon s90 internalscanon s90 f 2 lens
The S90 is tuned for low light photography. The f/2 lens, 10 megapixel sensor, and DIGIC IV processing are leading contributors.At 28mm the S90 provides an f/2 aperture, but that narrows to f/4.9 when you get to 105mm.
canon s90 3x zoom lensS90 control ring close up
The S90 offers a 3.8x zoom. Here fully extended at the 105mm maximum length.One of the more innovative aspects to the S90 is this control ring.
canon s90 control ringcanon s90 ring function
It can be turned to control a number of different camera settings, giving the S90 an analog feel.The S90 makes it easy to change the control ring's function with this dedicated button.
canon s90 shoots RAW (1 of 1)s90 candlelight
The S90 is a camera for enthusiasts, so naturally it offers RAW and RAW+JPEG shooting.The S90 has an ISO range of up to 3200, but it does offer a Low Light option with an ISO up to 12,800-though at reduced resolution.
canon s90 1 inch thick
Small and compact, the S90 checks in at just under an inch thick, making it easy to carry around in pants or jacket pockets.

Continue Reading This Review:

  1. Introduction
  2. Specifications
  3. Design and Interface
  4. Performance and IQ
  5. Verdict
  6. Image Samples

Similar Posts:


  1. Jack Le Boul says:

    If I understand this right. The LX3 has:

    - faster continuous shooting
    - larger sensor
    - HD video
    - wider lens

    The S90 has:

    - longer reach
    - lighter and smaller
    - better interface, camera control layouts

    Would be nice to have some real life pic and video comparisons.

    • Hi Jack,

      If you take a look at image samples from both cameras at Dpreview.com – it should become clearer – you can also do a side-side comparison on the site.

      Also there is another discussion on this site which compares the LX3 & S90 & there’s been quite an extensive conversation on alternatives (warning, it is rather a hefty read through now)

      regards

      Darin

    • Jack,
      If I could get my hands on an LX3 I would, they’re hard to come by even for reviewers.

  2. Jack Le Boul says:

    Played around with the LX3 and S90 this weekend in Zürich.

    The S90 review by Patrick was spot on. Really sharp pics, excellent manual controls and very well hardware layout. One notice that this camera was designed in 2009. Feel very small, sometimes slippery in your hand but probably one of the best PS camera today.

    Disappointments? Some. Biggest one – Video & hot-shoe.
    There was absolutely no reason for this cam not to have 720p. With the lens and sensor size the S90s video would be as sharp as its pics. Next upgrade will have it. Hot-shoe – there was the new Canon 270EX on display. Great small flash with all important bounce feature (similar to Nikon SB-400). I did not care to much for the built in flash.

    LX3.
    Picture quality was more or less identical which is to say very good. For PS “use” one does not notice any difference. Hardware layout is more flimsy, to many buttons and joystick at the same time.

    Video mode = fantastic !
    Lens and sensor really shine here.

    Hot-shoe – Yes, but there is no small bounce flash to buy for this camera similar to SB-400 or 270EX. (emphasis on small)

    Conclusion:
    I can not recommend one camera against the other.
    If video is important, yes LX3, if hardware layout and longer zoom, the S90.
    However, what I do know is that there are no other PS than these to buy.

    • Jack,
      Thanks for your analysis, i agree 100% —these are the two clear choices–each with their own advantages. I like the LX3’s retro style, aperture, and video. On the other hand I like the S90’s small size and control ring. Given the prices here in the states, I’d probably get the S90.

  3. Hi,

    I’m interested as to why people want a flash hotshoe on such a compact camera – sort of defeats the point of having a compact.

    also in about 7 years of using a digital camera, I have only used video less than 10 times on a compact camera – a digicam has much more scope & range of zoom – HD is nice but is it truly needed (considering little zoom, no spot lighting & proper stereo audio)?

    I have to agree with 1 point however, I do prefer the styling of the LX3, but that hotshoe needs a cover for when not in use 99% of the time

    Regards

    Darin

    • Jack Le Boul says:

      Darin,

      Agree.
      I would say that the main reasons one have not really used video on PS (me included) was the relative poor quality. Why waste the time and effort for pretty useless video. I think LX3 and others have changed my perception. Quality is really good and output easily editable on iMovie and alike.

      A camera for the price and quality of S90, there is no excuse for not having 720p. Even the cheaper Canons PS have it. Somebody, somewhere messed up.

      The hotshoe, I agree is more debatable.
      I came to appreciate it on my G10 when shooting indoors.
      The camera is a very different beast with the 270EX bounce flash.

      Considering the poor built in flash, It just gives your more shooting options than without.

Leave a Reply