Canon EOS 7D vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark II: Low Light ISO Comparison
Previously we took a look at how the Canon EOS 7D fared against the EOS 5D Mark II in a series of ISO comparisons taken in largely average lighting conditions. In this edition, let’s take a look at how the EOS 7D does when the lights are turned off.
For this test we photographed a scene at roughly 8:00 PM, which works out to about near total darkness where we’re located. In the example shot below, the scene is only being lit by the light above the door, and somewhat by lights behind the courthouse building. For the shots, I set the camera to f/11 and then came up with the following shutter times: 15s @ ISO 1600, 8s @ ISO 3200, 4s @ ISO 6400, and finally 2s @ ISO 12,800. White balance was set to auto, picture style was set to standard, noise reduction was disabled in all of its forms (long exposure and high ISO), and for this shot I also disabled auto lighting optimizer. Each shot was then taken into Canon’s Digital Photo Professional, and kicked out with zero noise reduction.
Other Parts In This Series
- Part 1: Introduction to the EOS 7D
- Part 2: ISO comparisons with EOS 5D Mark II
- Part 3: Low light ISO Comparisons
- Part 4: Canon EOS 7D Review (coming soon)
Availability
If you’re considering purchasing an EOS 7D, I strongly recommend getting one through B&H. They have the best prices, selection, and service, and by making your Canon EOS 7D (or other camera equipment) purchase through links like this, you help to insure we can continue to provide you with great content. Further, they also have the Canon EOS 7D in stock (as of this writing)!
Canon EOS 7D SLR Digital Camera (Body Only) Price: $ 1,699.95 at B&H Photo |
ISO Comparison
Use this sample shot to orient yourself to the locations of the crops below. For all crops, the EOS 7D is on the left and the EOS 5D Mark II is on the right. Click to expand each thumbnail to a much larger view. The crops are 100% samples from the original.
Crop 1
![]() | ![]() |
| ISO 1600. The EOS 7D looks just as usable here as it did in much better light. | ISO 3200 |
![]() | ![]() |
| ISO 6400 | ISO 12,800 |
Crop 2
![]() | ![]() |
| ISO 1600 | ISO 3200 |
![]() | ![]() |
| ISO 6400 | ISO 12,800 |
Crop 3
![]() | ![]() |
| ISO 1600 | ISO 3200 |
![]() | ![]() |
| ISO 6400 | ISO 12,800 |
Similar Posts:
- Canon EOS 1D Mark IV Initial Thoughts: ISO and Image …
- Canon EOS 1D Mark IV vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark II: ISO an…
- Canon EOS 7D Field Report: Introduction and ISO Samples
- Canon EOS 7D vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark II: ISO Comparison
- Pentax K-x vs. Nikon D3000: Entry-Level ISO Comparison

































Canon EOS 5D Mark II DSLR Camera Body with Free 16GB CF Card: $2499 and ships free from B&H Photo
Canon PowerShot SD780 IS Digital Camera: $229 and ships free from B&H Photo
LaCie 1TB d2 Quadra Hard Drive: $149 and ships free from B&H Photo








Thanks for the comparisons here, i liked them very much.
But i look like the 7D images looks sharper then the 5DmkII.
Or is it just me?
Marcel,
Your welcome, and I think they may be just a tad sharper…
Excellent test, thank you.
Finally a test that tells the story of low light performance differences in the true sense. None of the usual elementary tests done at other sites.
In summary, I see GREAT 7D performance so kudos to Canon. However, the 5D mark II is at least a half stop better at 1600 ISO and clearly ahead with 1-2 stop advantage above that.
Chuck,
hey thanks for compliment. I think the 7D is doing a fine job too, I had expected worse given the bump in megapixels, but I suppose sensor improvements and dual digics are doing their job. On the other hand, I’m happy to see my 5D2 doing fine over a year into its product cycle!
Thanks for the info. I am a semi-pro photographer and I currently use a Canon XTI and I need to up grade. In you opinion is a jump to a 7D enough or should I look at the 5D. Is the extra cash worth it or do you have another suggestion?
Really depends on just how important image quality matters in your work. If it is the main aspect–the 5D2 is your camera, in nearly all other aspect the 7D is definitely worth it. I’m an I.Q. freak—it’s all I really care about so that’s why I love the 5D2, but in many ways the EOS 7D is a superior camera.
I was in the same boat and I was interested in very nice all around lens also I wanted to buy nice printer (pro 9000 mark ii). I had 2 choices. 7d + 17-55mm (f2.8) or 5dii + 24-105mm. 7d+lens package was costing approx 2700 and
5d kit was available for 3500 ($400 rebate for printer). Considering printer rebate, the difference between both system was 400 (12%) so picking up 5dii was no brainer.
in the pictures I se that 5d has better quality, how you thing that 7d is better?
Besim,
Maybe you misunderstood, I don’t think the EOS 7D is better than the EOS 5D II, when it comes to image quality and ISO performance, the 5D2 is clearly superior.
If I bring D700 into picture, which one will you go with?
gurbally,
I love the D700, if I did sports or more dynamic subjects, I’d probably have one. Since I do more landscape, street, still life type work, I prefer the 5D2’s resolution.
Dev,
A wise decision. I loved the 7D, in many ways superior to the 5D2. Except IQ, which is what the 5D2 is all about. Sounds like a good deal too…