Canon EF-S 18-200mm IS f3.5-5.6 IS Review
The Canon EF-S 18-200mm IS f3.5-5.6 IS is a tempting lens for a lot of photographers because of the obvious huge convenience of attaching one lens to your camera and having all the bases covered. Now, I’ve been the happy owner of the Nikon equivalent to this lens, the 18-200 VR, and have been nothing but pleased, but as you’d expect there’s some caveats to the convenience. In a review at Camera Labs, the Canon EF-S 18-200mm IS f3.5-5.6 IS scores points for its massive photographic flexibility, but obviously optics aren’t superior, there’s the typical barrel distortion, light fall off, and notable for Canon EOS 50D owners, lack of resolving power:
Finally in terms of optical resolution, while the EF-S 18-200mm IS has sufficient resolving power for 8, 10 and 12 Megapixel DSLRs, it begins to struggle with higher resolution models like the 15.1 Megapixel EOS 50D. The bottom line is if you want to enjoy the maximum resolution of the 50D, you’ll need to fit it with a higher quality lens.
-Camera Labs
Now I don’t mean to turn you off the Canon EF-S 18-200mm IS, because while it does have some flaws, for many photographers the convenience will far outweigh the negatives, and probably lead to getting a lot of great shots.
Get the review here.
Get the lens here at Amazon (wow…$499!) or here at B & H Photo (also $499!).
Continue the Discussion
|
Join us on Facebook! Become a fan of Neutralday today! Become a fan of Neutralday on Facebook. Interact with us and stay updated on what's coming next at Neutralday, photography news, and other fans' insights. Follow us on Twitter! Grab our tweets right here. Follow Neutralday on Twitter. Insights on the cameras we're reviewing, and frequent photography related news, thoughts, and links. Support Neutralday by shopping at our preferred retailer, B&H Photo |
Explore Similar Posts
- Now Posted: Our In Depth Review of the Fujifilm FineP…
- Now Posted: Our In Depth Review of the Panasonic Lumi…
- Now Posted: Our Review of the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
- Now Posted: Our Sigma 150mm F2.8 EX APO DG HSM Macro …
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 (TZ10) Review





















Apple 15″ Macbook Pro 2.66GHZ (Core i7) Review
Canon 10×42 L IS WP Binoculars In Depth Review
Canon 18×50 IS All Weather Binoculars In Depth Review
Canon EOS 1D Mark IV In Depth Review
Canon EOS 7D In Depth Review
Canon EOS Rebel T2i (550D) In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot G11 In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot S90 In Depth Review
Fujifilm FinePix Z700EXR In Depth Review
Nikon Coolpix P100 In Depth Review
Nikon D3000 In Depth Review
Nikon D300s In Depth Review
Nikon D3s In Depth Review
Olympus E-P2 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 In Depth Review
Pentax K-x In Depth Review
Pentax Optio I-10 Digital Compact Camera In Depth Review
Samsung NX10 In Depth Review
Sigma 150mm F2.8 EX APO DG HSM Macro Review
Sigma DP2s In Depth Review
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5V In Depth Review
Swarovski EL 10×42 SwaroVision Binoculars In Depth Review








For a lens that covers such huge range, there’s sure to be loss in optical quality BUT such losses are usually noted by picky people, a.k.a. pixel peepers.
To me, the lens works fine. I have a Sigma 18-200 DC OS and I’ve also tested the Canon’s 18-200 offering and what I liked was that it’s f5.6 at 200, a little wider aperture than the Sigma’s. Funny thing how Canon took that long to release it when Sigma had it available for ages, I got it in Nov 2007 and it wasn’t even new then.
I’ve also heard others (frequent Canon L / USM lens user) being surprised at how fast the AF speed of this 18-200 IS.
goldfries,
I was happy to live with the “compromises” of the nikon 18-200mm VR, and as I said most folks will be happy to pick up a $500 lens with the convenience that the Canon 18-200 offers.