Best Digital Cameras of 2009
A number of great cameras were released to hungry photographers this year, but in my book, a handful managed to separate themselves from the rest of the herd. Now, the cameras listed below aren’t necessarily my personal favorites, I’m afraid my own tastes can veer off the beaten path just a little bit, but in general the cameras below represent the best of what’s available in their respective class and/or seemed to have done so many things right, that you can’t help but to notice them. With that, here’s my contenders for the best cameras of the year.

I can’t find much fault in the S90, it takes great pictures (for a compact), is compact in size, and is very enthusiast friendly with RAW+JPEG shooting, a fast wide angle lens at f/2, and full manual controls. On the downside, the S90 is a bit “slippery” and unfortunately is burdened with an unsatisfying dial on the backside of the camera. Other than that the S90 manages to do exactly what I expect Canon intended it to do, steal some thunder from the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3.
Canon EOS 7D
Another camera where Canon takes aim at a competitor, the EOS 7D seems intent to outgun Nikon’s D300s, and for the most part, it succeeds. It features a rugged weather-sealed camera body with excellent handling characteristics, a blistering continuous shooting speed of 8 fps, and the most robust HD video recording options currently available in a DSLR camera. The Nikon D300s does still provide that excellent 51 point AF system, but we had no problems covering a number of different shooting situations with the the 7D’s 19 point AF system. ISO performance is bit better than the D300s to my eye, and overall image quality is as good or better than any other camera that doesn’t have a full frame sensor inside.
Panasonic DMC-GF1
I give huge credit to Olympus for pioneering a camera type that many photographers have been waiting for, a compact camera body with interchangeable lenses and a DSLR sized sensor inside. The Olympus E-P1 was and is a very cool camera, that gets a number of things right, is fun to use, and looks incredible. Still, it’s the Panasonic GF1 that has the edge here, it just seems to clean up the E-P1’s loose ends, especially when it comes to focusing performance. It doesn’t have the E-P1’s built-in image stabilization, but paired with the Panasonic 20mm f/1.7, the GF1 seems like the perfect “DMD”. (DMD as described by the TheOnlinePhotographer, “decisive moment digital”)
Nikon D3x
This $8000 IQ monster is the professional’s choice for top of the line image quality in a DSLR camera. 24.5 megapixels, 5 fps continuous shooting, and Nikon’s proven 51 point AF system, all add up to a camera that easily rises to the level of “Flagship”.
Got something you’d like to add, or have your own list for the best of 2009, let’s hear it in the comments.
Similar Posts:
- 5 Unconventional but Compelling Compact Cameras
- Great Holiday Prices on Nikon, Canon, Pentax, and Son…
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 Review at Digital Camera Review
- Panasonic Lumix FZ35 Field Report: Introduction, ISO …
- The Hot List: What Digital Cameras Are Other Readers …
























Canon EOS 7D In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot G11 In Depth Review
Canon PowerShot S90 In Depth Review
Nikon D3000 In Depth Review
Nikon D300s In Depth Review
Nikon D3s In Depth Review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 In Depth Review
Pentax K-x In Depth Review








Interesting that the GF1 beat the E-P2! Half the price too! Glad I took the plunge.
Rupert,
I’d quite like to take your GF1 if you ever get tired of it? Seriously though, the GF1 seems to have nailed the micro four thirds promise.
Can’t fault your choices.
Did you see the custom-made alu grip for the S90? It’s gorgeous, and really helps the grip.
Yes, yes, I’ve seen it and man it is very nice.
I use a £1 aluminium tripod as a (left hand) grip for my S90. The tripod is cheap and nasty as a tripod but as a grip its a winner. Keep an eye out for them in thrift stores.
Interesting, thanks for the tip Paul!
Patrick,
I’m biased since I just bought one, but I sincerely believe Sony’s a850 to be one of the best digital cameras of 2009. There’s no single element that makes it stand out from the rest of the field… except for its price. And its image quality, specifically in proportion to its price. I’ve shot with Canon since 1997, but the quality of the images coming off of the Sony at ISO 100 through 400 are impressive. If you’re a landscape photographer or work in the studio, you owe it to yourself to check it out. Seriously. See if you could wrangle a copy from someone to test. Just do me a favor and don’t drive up the prices and scarcity of the Minolta lenses any more, okay?
Mark,
I’ve got no problem at all with the A850, and it does make for the most affordable full frame solution available (for a new camera that is). Definitely as you say, for landscape and studio, hard to beat.
Lovely work by the way…
I am lost, read many review here and there, but found no one to say (or I have problems with my english) what is best between:
- S90 and LX3
- S90, LX3 and GF1+20mm
Is it a problem on the S90 to do not have free room for polarized lense?
Thank you for your input on this Patrick,
Régis
Regis,
if money isn’t an object, get the GF1 and the 20mm, but it isn’t really comparable to the S90 and LX3 which have much smaller sensors, and thus not the same image quality as the GF1. Between the other 2, they’re both very good, and printed results will be quite similar, I’d say the S90, but you’ll be happy with either. To give a real recommendation though, you’d need to say what you want to shoot, and how much money you’ll spend.